Total
291808 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2006-6100 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2006. Notes: none | |||||
CVE-2006-2938 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2937. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. it was incorrectly used to identify CVE-2006-2937. Notes: none | |||||
CVE-2007-5421 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Cisco IOS 12.x and IOS XR allow attackers to execute arbitrary code, as demonstrated via the "Bind Shell", "Reverse Shell", and "Two byte rootshell (Tiny Shell)" attacks. NOTE: the vendor and researcher agree that this issue does not cross privilege boundaries, saying they do not "represent a vulnerability." The disclosure was intended to demonstrate techniques for exploitation, which is not covered by CVE | |||||
CVE-2007-0691 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2066. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2066. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2066 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2006-4854 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: Unspecified vulnerability in Microsoft Office 2000 (Chinese Edition) and Microsoft PowerPoint 2000 (Chinese Edition) allows user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted PPT document, as exploited by malware such as Trojan.PPDropper.E. NOTE: on 20060919, Microsoft notified CVE that this is a duplicate of CVE-2006-0009 | |||||
CVE-2006-5848 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-5878. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-5878. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-5878 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2007-0993 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-0933. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-0933 due to a typo. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-0933 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2008-0886 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0882. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-0882. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0882 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2007-6443 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6115. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6115. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6115 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2005-4531 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-3345. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-3345. CVE-2005-3345 had already been assigned, but not published, before this candidate was created. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-3345 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2005-1277 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-1766. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-1766. Notes: This duplicate occurred due to insufficient coordination across three separate parties. All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-1766 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2005-0728 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-0736. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-0736. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-0736 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2005-0751 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate has been revoked by its Candidate Numbering Authority (CNA) because it was initially assigned to a problem that was not a security issue. Notes: none | |||||
CVE-2006-1054 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-1861. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2006-1861. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-1861 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2006-0394 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-0848. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-0848. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-0848 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2005-2447 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-2370. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-2370. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-2370 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2006-1424 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-1482. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-1482. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-1482 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2006-0264 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-0259. Reason: This candidate is subsumed by CVE-2006-0259. An error during initial CVE analysis used the wrong set of affected versions for "DB10". Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-0259 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2005-0389 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-0814. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-0814. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-0814 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
CVE-2006-2599 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2587. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-2587. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-2587 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |