Vulnerabilities (CVE)

Filtered by vendor Google Subscribe
Total 15289 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v2 CVSS v3
CVE-2025-0437 1 Google 1 Chrome 2026-06-17 N/A 8.8 HIGH
Out of bounds read in Metrics in Google Chrome prior to 132.0.6834.83 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVE-2025-0436 1 Google 1 Chrome 2026-06-17 N/A 8.8 HIGH
Integer overflow in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 132.0.6834.83 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVE-2025-0435 1 Google 2 Android, Chrome 2026-06-17 N/A 6.5 MEDIUM
Inappropriate implementation in Navigation in Google Chrome on Android prior to 132.0.6834.83 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVE-2025-0434 1 Google 1 Chrome 2026-06-17 N/A 8.8 HIGH
Out of bounds memory access in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 132.0.6834.83 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVE-2025-0291 1 Google 1 Chrome 2026-06-17 N/A 8.8 HIGH
Type Confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 131.0.6778.264 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
CVE-2025-0246 2 Google, Mozilla 2 Android, Firefox 2026-06-17 N/A 6.5 MEDIUM
When using an invalid protocol scheme, an attacker could spoof the address bar. *Note: This issue only affected Android operating systems. Other operating systems are unaffected.* *Note: This issue is a different issue from CVE-2025-0244. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 134.
CVE-2025-0093 1 Google 1 Android 2026-06-17 N/A 7.5 HIGH
In handleBondStateChanged of AdapterService.java, there is a possible unapproved data access due to a missing permission check. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
CVE-2025-0092 1 Google 1 Android 2026-06-17 N/A 6.5 MEDIUM
In handleBondStateChanged of AdapterService.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
CVE-2025-0089 1 Google 1 Android 2026-06-17 N/A 7.8 HIGH
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to hijack the Launcher app due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2025-0087 1 Google 1 Android 2026-06-17 N/A 5.1 MEDIUM
In onCreate of UninstallerActivity.java, there is a possible way to uninstall a different user's app due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2025-0086 1 Google 1 Android 2026-06-17 N/A 6.2 MEDIUM
In onResult of AccountManagerService.java, there is a possible way to overwrite auth token due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2025-0084 1 Google 1 Android 2026-06-17 N/A 8.8 HIGH
In multiple locations, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a use after free. This could lead to remote code execution over Bluetooth, if HFP support is enabled, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2025-0083 1 Google 1 Android 2026-06-17 N/A 4.0 MEDIUM
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to access content across user profiles due to URI double encoding. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2025-0082 1 Google 1 Android 2026-06-17 N/A 5.5 MEDIUM
In multiple functions of StatusHint.java and TelecomServiceImpl.java, there is a possible way to reveal images across users due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation.
CVE-2025-0081 1 Google 1 Android 2026-06-17 N/A 7.5 HIGH
In dng_lossless_decoder::HuffDecode of dng_lossless_jpeg.cpp, there is a possible way to cause a crash due to uninitialized data. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2025-0080 1 Google 1 Android 2026-06-17 N/A 7.8 HIGH
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to overlay the installation confirmation dialog due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2025-0079 1 Google 1 Android 2026-06-17 N/A 7.8 HIGH
In multiple locations, there is a possible way that avdtp and avctp channels could be unencrypted due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2025-0078 1 Google 1 Android 2026-06-17 N/A 8.8 HIGH
In main of main.cpp, there is a possible way to bypass SELinux due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2025-0077 1 Google 1 Android 2026-06-17 N/A 4.0 MEDIUM
In multiple functions of UserController.java, there is a possible lock screen bypass due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2025-0076 1 Google 1 Android 2026-06-17 N/A 3.3 LOW
In multiple locations, there is a possible way to view icons belonging to another user due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.