Filtered by vendor Artifex
Subscribe
Total
244 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-12798 | 1 Artifex | 1 Mujs | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Artifex MuJS 1.0.5. regcompx in regexp.c does not restrict regular expression program size, leading to an overflow of the parsed syntax list size. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11413 | 1 Artifex | 1 Mujs | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Artifex MuJS 1.0.5. It has unlimited recursion because the match function in regexp.c lacks a depth check. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11412 | 2 Artifex, Fedoraproject | 2 Mujs, Fedora | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Artifex MuJS 1.0.5. jscompile.c can cause a denial of service (invalid stack-frame jump) because it lacks an ENDTRY opcode call. | |||||
| CVE-2019-11411 | 1 Artifex | 1 Mujs | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Artifex MuJS 1.0.5. The Number#toFixed() and numtostr implementations in jsnumber.c have a stack-based buffer overflow. | |||||
| CVE-2019-10216 | 2 Artifex, Redhat | 9 Ghostscript, 3scale Api Management, Enterprise Linux and 6 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| In ghostscript before version 9.50, the .buildfont1 procedure did not properly secure its privileged calls, enabling scripts to bypass `-dSAFER` restrictions. An attacker could abuse this flaw by creating a specially crafted PostScript file that could escalate privileges and access files outside of restricted areas. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6544 | 2 Artifex, Debian | 2 Mupdf, Debian Linux | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| pdf_load_obj_stm in pdf/pdf-xref.c in Artifex MuPDF 1.12.0 could reference the object stream recursively and therefore run out of error stack, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted PDF document. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6192 | 2 Artifex, Debian | 2 Mupdf, Debian Linux | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In Artifex MuPDF 1.12.0, the pdf_read_new_xref function in pdf/pdf-xref.c allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation violation and application crash) via a crafted pdf file. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6191 | 1 Artifex | 1 Mujs | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| The js_strtod function in jsdtoa.c in Artifex MuJS through 1.0.2 has an integer overflow because of incorrect exponent validation. | |||||
| CVE-2018-6187 | 2 Artifex, Debian | 2 Mupdf, Debian Linux | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In Artifex MuPDF 1.12.0, there is a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the do_pdf_save_document function in the pdf/pdf-write.c file. Remote attackers could leverage the vulnerability to cause a denial of service via a crafted pdf file. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5759 | 1 Artifex | 1 Mujs | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| jsparse.c in Artifex MuJS through 1.0.2 does not properly maintain the AST depth for binary expressions, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (excessive recursion) via a crafted file. | |||||
| CVE-2018-5686 | 2 Artifex, Debian | 2 Mupdf, Debian Linux | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In MuPDF 1.12.0, there is an infinite loop vulnerability and application hang in the pdf_parse_array function (pdf/pdf-parse.c) because EOF is not considered. Remote attackers could leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service via a crafted pdf file. | |||||
| CVE-2018-19882 | 1 Artifex | 1 Mupdf | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In Artifex MuPDF 1.14.0, the svg_run_image function in svg/svg-run.c allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (href_att NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via a crafted svg file, as demonstrated by mupdf-gl. | |||||
| CVE-2018-19881 | 1 Artifex | 1 Mupdf | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In Artifex MuPDF 1.14.0, svg/svg-run.c allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (recursive calls followed by a fitz/xml.c fz_xml_att crash from excessive stack consumption) via a crafted svg file, as demonstrated by mupdf-gl. | |||||
| CVE-2018-19777 | 2 Artifex, Debian | 2 Mupdf, Debian Linux | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In Artifex MuPDF 1.14.0, there is an infinite loop in the function svg_dev_end_tile in fitz/svg-device.c, as demonstrated by mutool. | |||||
| CVE-2018-19478 | 2 Artifex, Debian | 2 Ghostscript, Debian Linux | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| In Artifex Ghostscript before 9.26, a carefully crafted PDF file can trigger an extremely long running computation when parsing the file. | |||||
| CVE-2018-19477 | 4 Artifex, Canonical, Debian and 1 more | 10 Ghostscript, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| psi/zfjbig2.c in Artifex Ghostscript before 9.26 allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions because of a JBIG2Decode type confusion. | |||||
| CVE-2018-19476 | 4 Artifex, Canonical, Debian and 1 more | 10 Ghostscript, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| psi/zicc.c in Artifex Ghostscript before 9.26 allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions because of a setcolorspace type confusion. | |||||
| CVE-2018-19475 | 4 Artifex, Canonical, Debian and 1 more | 10 Ghostscript, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| psi/zdevice2.c in Artifex Ghostscript before 9.26 allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions because available stack space is not checked when the device remains the same. | |||||
| CVE-2018-19409 | 4 Artifex, Canonical, Debian and 1 more | 8 Ghostscript, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Artifex Ghostscript before 9.26. LockSafetyParams is not checked correctly if another device is used. | |||||
| CVE-2018-19134 | 3 Artifex, Debian, Redhat | 7 Ghostscript, Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux Desktop and 4 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| In Artifex Ghostscript through 9.25, the setpattern operator did not properly validate certain types. A specially crafted PostScript document could exploit this to crash Ghostscript or, possibly, execute arbitrary code in the context of the Ghostscript process. This is a type confusion issue because of failure to check whether the Implementation of a pattern dictionary was a structure type. | |||||