Total
35700 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2000-0672 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomcat | 2026-06-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The default configuration of Jakarta Tomcat does not restrict access to the /admin context, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files by directly calling the administrative servlets to add a context for the root directory. | |||||
| CVE-2000-0524 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Exchange Server, Outlook | 2026-06-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Microsoft Outlook and Outlook Express allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service by sending email messages with blank fields such as BCC, Reply-To, Return-Path, or From. | |||||
| CVE-1999-1589 | 1 Ibm | 1 Aix | 2026-06-16 | 7.2 HIGH | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in crontab in IBM AIX 3.2 allows local users to gain root privileges via unknown attack vectors. | |||||
| CVE-1999-1412 | 2 Apache, Apple | 2 Http Server, Macos | 2026-06-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| A possible interaction between Apple MacOS X release 1.0 and Apache HTTP server allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a flood of HTTP GET requests to CGI programs, which generates a large number of processes. | |||||
| CVE-1999-1302 | 1 Sco | 5 Open Desktop, Open Desktop Lite, Openserver Enterprise System and 2 more | 2026-06-16 | 7.2 HIGH | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in pt_chmod in SCO UNIX 4.2 and earlier allows local users to gain root access. | |||||
| CVE-1999-1043 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Exchange Server | 2026-06-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Microsoft Exchange Server 5.5 and 5.0 does not properly handle (1) malformed NNTP data, or (2) malformed SMTP data, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application error). | |||||
| CVE-1999-0682 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Exchange Server | 2026-06-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Microsoft Exchange 5.5 allows a remote attacker to relay email (i.e. spam) using encapsulated SMTP addresses, even if the anti-relaying features are enabled. | |||||
| CVE-1999-0524 | 11 Apple, Cisco, Hp and 8 more | 14 Mac Os X, Macos, Ios and 11 more | 2026-06-16 | 2.1 LOW | 4.0 MEDIUM |
| ICMP information such as (1) netmask and (2) timestamp is allowed from arbitrary hosts. | |||||
| CVE-1999-0289 | 2 Apache, Microsoft | 2 Http Server, Windows | 2026-06-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The Apache web server for Win32 may provide access to restricted files when a . (dot) is appended to a requested URL. | |||||
| CVE-1999-0236 | 2 Apache, Illinois | 2 Http Server, Ncsa Httpd | 2026-06-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| ScriptAlias directory in NCSA and Apache httpd allowed attackers to read CGI programs. | |||||
| CVE-1999-0228 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Windows Nt | 2026-06-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| Denial of service in RPCSS.EXE program (RPC Locator) in Windows NT. | |||||
| CVE-1999-0144 | 1 Qmail Project | 1 Qmail | 2026-06-16 | 2.1 LOW | N/A |
| Denial of service in Qmail by specifying a large number of recipients with the RCPT command. | |||||
| CVE-1999-0070 | 1 Apache | 1 Http Server | 2026-06-16 | 5.0 MEDIUM | N/A |
| test-cgi program allows an attacker to list files on the server. | |||||
| CVE-2018-17793 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none | |||||
| CVE-2012-2639 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-4940. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2011-4940. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-4940 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2010-0200 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1241. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1241. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1241 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2008-2033 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-1381. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-1381. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-1381 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2007-6440 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6112. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6112. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6112 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2007-4576 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4575. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-4575. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4575 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||
| CVE-2007-6445 | 2024-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6117. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6117. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6117 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | |||||