Total
4433 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-43837 | 1 Vault-cli Project | 1 Vault-cli | 2024-11-21 | 9.0 HIGH | 8.4 HIGH |
| vault-cli is a configurable command-line interface tool (and python library) to interact with Hashicorp Vault. In versions before 3.0.0 vault-cli features the ability for rendering templated values. When a secret starts with the prefix `!template!`, vault-cli interprets the rest of the contents of the secret as a Jinja2 template. Jinja2 is a powerful templating engine and is not designed to safely render arbitrary templates. An attacker controlling a jinja2 template rendered on a machine can trigger arbitrary code, making this a Remote Code Execution (RCE) risk. If the content of the vault can be completely trusted, then this is not a problem. Otherwise, if your threat model includes cases where an attacker can manipulate a secret value read from the vault using vault-cli, then this vulnerability may impact you. In 3.0.0, the code related to interpreting vault templated secrets has been removed entirely. Users are advised to upgrade as soon as possible. For users unable to upgrade a workaround does exist. Using the environment variable `VAULT_CLI_RENDER=false` or the flag `--no-render` (placed between `vault-cli` and the subcommand, e.g. `vault-cli --no-render get-all`) or adding `render: false` to the vault-cli configuration yaml file disables rendering and removes the vulnerability. Using the python library, you can use: `vault_cli.get_client(render=False)` when creating your client to get a client that will not render templated secrets and thus operates securely. | |||||
| CVE-2021-43811 | 1 Amazon | 1 Sockeye | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Sockeye is an open-source sequence-to-sequence framework for Neural Machine Translation built on PyTorch. Sockeye uses YAML to store model and data configurations on disk. Versions below 2.3.24 use unsafe YAML loading, which can be made to execute arbitrary code embedded in config files. An attacker can add malicious code to the config file of a trained model and attempt to convince users to download and run it. If users run the model, the embedded code will run locally. The issue is fixed in version 2.3.24. | |||||
| CVE-2021-43466 | 1 Thymeleaf | 1 Thymeleaf | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In the thymeleaf-spring5:3.0.12 component, thymeleaf combined with specific scenarios in template injection may lead to remote code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2021-43281 | 1 Mybb | 1 Mybb | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| MyBB before 1.8.29 allows Remote Code Injection by an admin with the "Can manage settings?" permission. The Admin CP's Settings management module does not validate setting types correctly on insertion and update, making it possible to add settings of supported type "php" with PHP code, executed on Change Settings pages. | |||||
| CVE-2021-43269 | 1 Code42 | 1 Code42 | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| In Code42 app before 8.8.0, eval injection allows an attacker to change a device’s proxy configuration to use a malicious proxy auto-config (PAC) file, leading to arbitrary code execution. This affects Incydr Basic, Advanced, and Gov F1; CrashPlan Cloud; and CrashPlan for Small Business. (Incydr Professional and Enterprise are unaffected.) | |||||
| CVE-2021-43221 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Edge Chromium | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.2 MEDIUM |
| Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2021-43208 | 1 Microsoft | 1 3d Viewer | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| 3D Viewer Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2021-43097 | 1 Diyhi | 1 Bbs | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 7.2 HIGH |
| A Server-side Template Injection (SSTI) vulnerability exists in bbs 5.3 in TemplateManageAction.javawhich could let a malicoius user execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2021-42754 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2024-11-21 | 3.5 LOW | 3.2 LOW |
| An improper control of generation of code vulnerability [CWE-94] in FortiClientMacOS versions 7.0.0 and below and 6.4.5 and below may allow an authenticated attacker to hijack the MacOS camera without the user permission via the malicious dylib file. | |||||
| CVE-2021-42694 | 1 Unicode | 1 Unicode | 2024-11-21 | 5.1 MEDIUM | 8.3 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in the character definitions of the Unicode Specification through 14.0. The specification allows an adversary to produce source code identifiers such as function names using homoglyphs that render visually identical to a target identifier. Adversaries can leverage this to inject code via adversarial identifier definitions in upstream software dependencies invoked deceptively in downstream software. NOTE: the Unicode Consortium offers the following alternative approach to presenting this concern. An issue is noted in the nature of international text that can affect applications that implement support for The Unicode Standard (all versions). Unless mitigated, an adversary could produce source code identifiers using homoglyph characters that render visually identical to but are distinct from a target identifier. In this way, an adversary could inject adversarial identifier definitions in upstream software that are not detected by human reviewers and are invoked deceptively in downstream software. The Unicode Consortium has documented this class of security vulnerability in its document, Unicode Technical Report #36, Unicode Security Considerations. The Unicode Consortium also provides guidance on mitigations for this class of issues in Unicode Technical Standard #39, Unicode Security Mechanisms. | |||||
| CVE-2021-42651 | 1 Pentest Collaboration Framework Project | 1 Pentest Collaboration Framework | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A Server Side Template Injection (SSTI) vulnerability in Pentest-Collaboration-Framework v1.0.8 allows an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code through /project/PROJECTNAME/reports/. | |||||
| CVE-2021-42574 | 3 Fedoraproject, Starwindsoftware, Unicode | 3 Fedora, Starwind Virtual San, Unicode | 2024-11-21 | 5.1 MEDIUM | 8.3 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in the Bidirectional Algorithm in the Unicode Specification through 14.0. It permits the visual reordering of characters via control sequences, which can be used to craft source code that renders different logic than the logical ordering of tokens ingested by compilers and interpreters. Adversaries can leverage this to encode source code for compilers accepting Unicode such that targeted vulnerabilities are introduced invisibly to human reviewers. NOTE: the Unicode Consortium offers the following alternative approach to presenting this concern. An issue is noted in the nature of international text that can affect applications that implement support for The Unicode Standard and the Unicode Bidirectional Algorithm (all versions). Due to text display behavior when text includes left-to-right and right-to-left characters, the visual order of tokens may be different from their logical order. Additionally, control characters needed to fully support the requirements of bidirectional text can further obfuscate the logical order of tokens. Unless mitigated, an adversary could craft source code such that the ordering of tokens perceived by human reviewers does not match what will be processed by a compiler/interpreter/etc. The Unicode Consortium has documented this class of vulnerability in its document, Unicode Technical Report #36, Unicode Security Considerations. The Unicode Consortium also provides guidance on mitigations for this class of issues in Unicode Technical Standard #39, Unicode Security Mechanisms, and in Unicode Standard Annex #31, Unicode Identifier and Pattern Syntax. Also, the BIDI specification allows applications to tailor the implementation in ways that can mitigate misleading visual reordering in program text; see HL4 in Unicode Standard Annex #9, Unicode Bidirectional Algorithm. | |||||
| CVE-2021-42309 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Sharepoint Enterprise Server, Sharepoint Foundation, Sharepoint Server | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2021-42298 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Malware Protection Engine | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Microsoft Defender Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2021-42296 | 1 Microsoft | 2 365 Apps, Office | 2024-11-21 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2021-42139 | 1 Deno | 1 Deno Standard Modules | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Deno Standard Modules before 0.107.0 allows Code Injection via an untrusted YAML file in certain configurations. | |||||
| CVE-2021-42057 | 1 Obsidian | 1 Obsidian Dataview | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Obsidian Dataview through 0.4.12-hotfix1 allows eval injection. The evalInContext function in executes user input, which allows an attacker to craft malicious Markdown files that will execute arbitrary code once opened. NOTE: 0.4.13 provides a mitigation for some use cases. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41749 | 1 Nystudio107 | 1 Seomatic | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In the SEOmatic plugin up to 3.4.11 for Craft CMS 3, it is possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform a Server-Side Template Injection, allowing for remote code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41653 | 1 Tp-link | 2 Tl-wr840n, Tl-wr840n Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| The PING function on the TP-Link TL-WR840N EU v5 router with firmware through TL-WR840N(EU)_V5_171211 is vulnerable to remote code execution via a crafted payload in an IP address input field. | |||||
| CVE-2021-41619 | 1 Gradle | 1 Enterprise | 2024-11-21 | 9.0 HIGH | 7.2 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Gradle Enterprise before 2021.1.2. There is potential remote code execution via the application startup configuration. The installation configuration user interface (available to administrators) allows specifying arbitrary Java Virtual Machine startup options. Some of these options, such as -XX:OnOutOfMemoryError, allow specifying a command to be run on the host. This can be abused to run arbitrary commands on the host, should an attacker gain administrative access to the application. | |||||