Total
1850 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-3718 | 6 Canonical, Imagemagick, Opensuse and 3 more | 30 Ubuntu Linux, Imagemagick, Leap and 27 more | 2025-10-22 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| The (1) HTTP and (2) FTP coders in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x before 7.0.1-1 allow remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted image. | |||||
| CVE-2025-62427 | 2025-10-21 | N/A | N/A | ||
| The Angular SSR is a server-rise rendering tool for Angular applications. The vulnerability is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) flaw within the URL resolution mechanism of Angular's Server-Side Rendering package (@angular/ssr) before 19.2.18, 20.3.6, and 21.0.0-next.8. The function createRequestUrl uses the native URL constructor. When an incoming request path (e.g., originalUrl or url) begins with a double forward slash (//) or backslash (\\), the URL constructor treats it as a schema-relative URL. This behavior overrides the security-intended base URL (protocol, host, and port) supplied as the second argument, instead resolving the URL against the scheme of the base URL but adopting the attacker-controlled hostname. This allows an attacker to specify an external domain in the URL path, tricking the Angular SSR environment into setting the page's virtual location (accessible via DOCUMENT or PlatformLocation tokens) to this attacker-controlled domain. Any subsequent relative HTTP requests made during the SSR process (e.g., using HttpClient.get('assets/data.json')) will be incorrectly resolved against the attacker's domain, forcing the server to communicate with an arbitrary external endpoint. This vulnerability is fixed in 19.2.18, 20.3.6, and 21.0.0-next.8. | |||||
| CVE-2025-60279 | 2025-10-21 | N/A | 9.6 CRITICAL | ||
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Illia Cloud illia-Builder before v4.8.5 allows authenticated users to send arbitrary requests to internal services via the API. An attacker can leverage this to enumerate open ports based on response discrepancies and interact with internal services. | |||||
| CVE-2025-11864 | 2025-10-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 7.3 HIGH | ||
| A vulnerability was identified in NucleoidAI Nucleoid up to 0.7.10. The impacted element is the function extension.apply of the file /src/cluster.ts of the component Outbound Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument https/ip/port/path/headers leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. | |||||
| CVE-2025-62505 | 2025-10-21 | N/A | 3.0 LOW | ||
| LobeChat is an open source chat application platform. The web-crawler package in LobeChat version 1.136.1 allows server-side request forgery (SSRF) in the tools.search.crawlPages tRPC endpoint. A client can supply an arbitrary urls array together with impls containing the value naive. The service passes the user URLs to Crawler.crawl and the naive implementation performs a server-side fetch of each supplied URL without validating or restricting internal network addresses (such as localhost, 127.0.0.1, private IP ranges, or cloud instance metadata endpoints). This allows an attacker with a valid user token (or in development mode using a bypass header) to make the server disclose responses from internal HTTP services, potentially exposing internal API data or cloud metadata credentials. Version 1.136.2 fixes the issue. Update to version 1.136.2. No known workarounds exist. | |||||
| CVE-2025-11536 | 2025-10-21 | N/A | 5.0 MEDIUM | ||
| The Element Pack Addons for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Blind Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 8.2.5 via the wp_ajax_import_elementor_template action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | |||||
| CVE-2025-11361 | 2025-10-21 | N/A | 6.4 MEDIUM | ||
| The Gutenberg Essential Blocks – Page Builder for Gutenberg Blocks & Patterns plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.7.1 via the eb_save_ai_generated_image function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | |||||
| CVE-2025-61488 | 2025-10-21 | N/A | 7.6 HIGH | ||
| An issue in Senayan Library Management System (SLiMS) 9 Bulian v.9.6.1 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the scrap_image.php component and the imageURL parameter | |||||
| CVE-2024-12068 | 1 Hliu | 1 Llava | 2025-10-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was discovered in haotian-liu/llava, affecting version git c121f04. This vulnerability allows an attacker to make the server perform HTTP requests to arbitrary URLs, potentially accessing sensitive data that is only accessible from the server, such as AWS metadata credentials. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9065 | 1 Rockwellautomation | 1 Thinmanager | 2025-10-20 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A server-side request forgery security issue exists within Rockwell Automation ThinManager® software due to the lack of input sanitization. Authenticated attackers can exploit this vulnerability by specifying external SMB paths, exposing the ThinServer® service account NTLM hash. | |||||
| CVE-2025-7759 | 1 Jeesite | 1 Jeesite | 2025-10-20 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability was identified in thinkgem JeeSite up to 5.12.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file modules/core/src/main/java/com/jeesite/common/ueditor/ActionEnter.java of the component UEditor Image Grabber. Such manipulation of the argument Source leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The name of the patch is 1c5e49b0818037452148e0f8ff69ed04cb8fefdc. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2025-57644 | 1 Accela | 1 Automation Platform | 2025-10-17 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Accela Automation Platform 22.2.3.0.230103 contains multiple vulnerabilities in the Test Script feature. An authenticated administrative user can execute arbitrary Java code on the server, resulting in remote code execution. In addition, improper input validation allows for arbitrary file write and server-side request forgery (SSRF), enabling interaction with internal or external systems. Successful exploitation can lead to full server compromise, unauthorized access to sensitive data, and further network exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-54087 | 1 Absolute | 1 Secure Access | 2025-10-16 | N/A | 2.6 LOW |
| CVE-2025-54087 is a server-side request forgery vulnerability in Secure Access prior to version 14.10. Attackers with administrative privileges can publish a crafted test HTTP request originating from the Secure Access server. The attack complexity is high, there are no attack requirements, and user interaction is required. There is no direct impact to confidentiality, integrity, or availability. There is a low severity subsequent system impact to integrity. | |||||
| CVE-2025-57305 | 1 Vitaracharts | 1 Vitaracharts | 2025-10-16 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| VitaraCharts 5.3.5 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in fileLoader.jsp. | |||||
| CVE-2025-60540 | 2025-10-16 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
| karakeep v0.26.0 to v0.7.0 was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). | |||||
| CVE-2025-10056 | 2025-10-16 | N/A | 4.4 MEDIUM | ||
| The Task Scheduler plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.3 via the “Check Website” task. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | |||||
| CVE-2025-55971 | 1 Tcl | 2 65c655, 65c655 Firmware | 2025-10-15 | N/A | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| TCL 65C655 Smart TV, running firmware version V8-R75PT01-LF1V269.001116 (Android TV, Kernel 5.4.242+), is vulnerable to a blind, unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability via the UPnP MediaRenderer service (AVTransport:1). The device accepts unauthenticated SetAVTransportURI SOAP requests over TCP/16398 and attempts to retrieve externally referenced URIs, including attacker-controlled payloads. The blind SSRF allows for sending requests on behalf of the TV, which can be leveraged to probe for other internal or external services accessible by the device (e.g., 127.0.0.1:16XXX, LAN services, or internet targets), potentially enabling additional exploit chains. | |||||
| CVE-2023-45195 | 1 Adminerevo | 1 Adminerevo | 2025-10-15 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Adminer and AdminerEvo are vulnerable to SSRF via database connection fields. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to enumerate or access systems the attacker would not otherwise have access to. Adminer is no longer supported, but this issue was fixed in AdminerEvo version 4.8.4. | |||||
| CVE-2024-8955 | 1 Composio | 1 Composio | 2025-10-15 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in composiohq/composio version v0.4.4. This vulnerability allows an attacker to read the contents of any file in the system by exploiting the BROWSERTOOL_GOTO_PAGE and BROWSERTOOL_GET_PAGE_DETAILS actions. | |||||
| CVE-2024-3152 | 1 Mintplexlabs | 1 Anythingllm | 2025-10-15 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| mintplex-labs/anything-llm is vulnerable to multiple security issues due to improper input validation in several endpoints. An attacker can exploit these vulnerabilities to escalate privileges from a default user role to an admin role, read and delete arbitrary files on the system, and perform Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attacks. The vulnerabilities are present in the `/request-token`, `/workspace/:slug/thread/:threadSlug/update`, `/system/remove-logo`, `/system/logo`, and collector's `/process` endpoints. These issues are due to the application's failure to properly validate user input before passing it to `prisma` functions and other critical operations. Affected versions include the latest version prior to 1.0.0. | |||||