Total
3147 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-31116 | 1 Opensecurity | 1 Mobile Security Framework | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is a pen-testing, malware analysis and security assessment framework capable of performing static and dynamic analysis. The mitigation for CVE-2024-29190 in valid_host() uses socket.gethostbyname(), which is vulnerable to SSRF abuse using DNS rebinding technique. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.3.2. | |||||
| CVE-2025-31076 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.9 MEDIUM | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WP Compress WP Compress for MainWP wp-compress-mainwp allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Compress for MainWP: from n/a through <= 6.30.03. | |||||
| CVE-2025-31009 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Jan Boddez IndieBlocks indieblocks allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects IndieBlocks: from n/a through <= 0.13.1. | |||||
| CVE-2025-30997 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SmartDataSoft Car Repair Services car-repair-services allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Car Repair Services: from n/a through <= 5.0. | |||||
| CVE-2025-30976 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.9 MEDIUM | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in wpdive Nexa Blocks nexa-blocks allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Nexa Blocks: from n/a through <= 1.1.1. | |||||
| CVE-2025-30964 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in ThemeGoods Photography photography allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Photography: from n/a through < 7.7.6. | |||||
| CVE-2025-30914 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.4 MEDIUM | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Roxnor Metform metform allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Metform: from n/a through <= 3.9.2. | |||||
| CVE-2025-30680 | 2 Microsoft, Trendmicro | 2 Windows, Apex Central | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| A Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex Central (SaaS) could allow an attacker to manipulate certain parameters leading to information disclosure on affected installations. Please note: this vulnerability only affects the SaaS instance of Apex Central - customers that automatically apply Trend Micro's monthly maintenance releases to the SaaS instance do not have to take any further action. | |||||
| CVE-2025-30679 | 2 Microsoft, Trendmicro | 2 Windows, Apex Central | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex Central (on-premise) modOSCE component could allow an attacker to manipulate certain parameters leading to information disclosure on affected installations. | |||||
| CVE-2025-30678 | 2 Microsoft, Trendmicro | 2 Windows, Apex Central | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex Central (on-premise) modTMSM component could allow an attacker to manipulate certain parameters leading to information disclosure on affected installations. | |||||
| CVE-2025-30220 | 2 Geotools, Osgeo | 3 Geotools, Geonetwork, Geoserver | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| GeoServer is an open source server that allows users to share and edit geospatial data. GeoTools Schema class use of Eclipse XSD library to represent schema data structure is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) exploit. This impacts whoever exposes XML processing with gt-xsd-core involved in parsing, when the documents carry a reference to an external XML schema. The gt-xsd-core Schemas class is not using the EntityResolver provided by the ParserHandler (if any was configured). This also impacts users of gt-wfs-ng DataStore where the ENTITY_RESOLVER connection parameter was not being used as intended. This vulnerability is fixed in GeoTools 33.1, 32.3, 31.7, and 28.6.1, GeoServer 2.27.1, 2.26.3, and 2.25.7, and GeoNetwork 4.4.8 and 4.2.13. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2997 | 1 Zhangyanbo2007 | 1 Youkefu | 2026-06-17 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability was found in zhangyanbo2007 youkefu 4.2.0. It has been classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function of the file /res/url. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2987 | 1 Ibm | 1 Maximo Asset Management | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 3.8 LOW |
| IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.6.1.3 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2940 | 1 Wpmanageninja | 1 Ninja Tables | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| The Ninja Tables – Easy Data Table Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.0.18 via the args[url] parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2835 | 1 Zhyd | 1 Oneblog | 2026-06-17 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability was found in zhangyd-c OneBlog up to 2.3.9. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function autoLink of the file com/zyd/blog/controller/RestApiController.java. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2828 | 1 Langchain | 1 Langchain | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the RequestsToolkit component of the langchain-community package (specifically, langchain_community.agent_toolkits.openapi.toolkit.RequestsToolkit) in langchain-ai/langchain version 0.0.27. This vulnerability occurs because the toolkit does not enforce restrictions on requests to remote internet addresses, allowing it to also access local addresses. As a result, an attacker could exploit this flaw to perform port scans, access local services, retrieve instance metadata from cloud environments (e.g., Azure, AWS), and interact with servers on the local network. This issue has been fixed in version 0.0.28. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2691 | 1 Nossrf Project | 1 Nossrf | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.2 HIGH |
| Versions of the package nossrf before 1.0.4 are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) where an attacker can provide a hostname that resolves to a local or reserved IP address space and bypass the SSRF protection mechanism. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2245 | 1 Bitdefender | 1 Gravityzone Update Server | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the Bitdefender GravityZone Update Server when operating in Relay Mode. The HTTP proxy component on port 7074 uses a domain allowlist to restrict outbound requests, but fails to properly sanitize hostnames containing null-byte (%00) sequences. By crafting a request to a domain such as evil.com%00.bitdefender.com, an attacker can bypass the allowlist check, causing the proxy to forward requests to arbitrary external or internal systems. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2243 | 1 Bitdefender | 1 Gravityzone | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Bitdefender GravityZone Console allows an attacker to bypass input validation logic using leading characters in DNS requests. Paired with other potential vulnerabilities, this bypass could be used for execution of third party code. This issue affects GravityZone Console: before 6.41.2.1. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2192 | 2026-06-17 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Stoque Zeev.it 4.24. This affects an unknown part of the file /Login?inpLostSession=1 of the component Login Page. The manipulation of the argument inpRedirectURL leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | |||||