Total
3126 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-0560 | 1 Lollms | 1 Lollms | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in parisneo/lollms versions prior to 2.2.0, specifically in the `/api/files/export-content` endpoint. The `_download_image_to_temp()` function in `backend/routers/files.py` fails to validate user-controlled URLs, allowing attackers to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints. This vulnerability can lead to internal network access, cloud metadata access, information disclosure, port scanning, and potentially remote code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9975 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.8 MEDIUM | ||
| The WP Scraper plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.8.1 via the wp_scraper_extract_content function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. On Cloud instances, this issue allows for metadata retrieving. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9960 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| A restriction bypass vulnerability in is-localhost-ip could allow attackers to perform Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). This issue affects is-localhost-ip: 2.0.0. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9868 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the Remote Browser Plugin in Sonatype Nexus Repository 2.x up to and including 2.15.2 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to exfiltrate proxy repository credentials via crafted HTTP requests. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9862 | 1 Ghost | 1 Ghost | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Ghost allows an attacker to access internal resources.This issue affects Ghost: from 6.0.0 through 6.0.8, from 5.99.0 through 5.130.3. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9821 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 2.7 LOW | ||
| SummaryUsers with webhook permissions can conduct SSRF via webhooks. If they have permission to view the webhook logs, the (partial) request response is also disclosed DetailsWhen sending webhooks, the destination is not validated, causing SSRF. ImpactBypass of firewalls to interact with internal services. See https://owasp.org/Top10/A10_2021-Server-Side_Request_Forgery_%28SSRF%29/ for more potential impact. Resources https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Server_Side_Request_Forgery_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html for more information on SSRF and its fix. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9805 | 1 Sim | 1 Sim | 2026-06-17 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability was found in SimStudioAI sim up to 51b1e97fa22c48d144aef75f8ca31a74ad2cfed2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file apps/sim/app/api/proxy/image/route.ts. The manipulation results in server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made public and could be used. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The patch is identified as 3424a338b763115f0269b209e777608e4cd31785. Applying a patch is advised to resolve this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9799 | 1 Langfuse | 1 Langfuse | 2026-06-17 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 5.0 MEDIUM |
| A security flaw has been discovered in Langfuse up to 3.88.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function promptChangeEventSourcing of the file web/src/features/prompts/server/routers/promptRouter.ts of the component Webhook Handler. Performing manipulation results in server-side request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9522 | 1 Tp-link | 1 Omada Controller | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Omada Controllers through webhook functionality, enabling crafted requests to internal services, which may lead to enumeration of information. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9414 | 1 Kodcloud | 1 Kodbox | 2026-06-17 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability was found in kalcaddle kodbox 1.61. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /?explorer/upload/serverDownload of the component Download from Link Handler. Performing manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9402 | 1 Utcms Project | 1 Utcms | 2026-06-17 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability was found in HuangDou UTCMS 9. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file app/modules/ut-frame/admin/update.php of the component Config Handler. Performing manipulation of the argument UPDATEURL results in server-side request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9395 | 2026-06-17 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 6.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability was identified in wangsongyan wblog 0.0.1. This affects the function RestorePost of the file backup.go. Such manipulation of the argument fileName leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9269 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been identified in the embedded web server in various Lexmark devices. This vulnerability can be leveraged by an attacker to force the device to send an arbitrary HTTP request to a third-party server. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can lead to internal network access / potential data disclosure from a device. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9065 | 1 Rockwellautomation | 1 Thinmanager | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| A server-side request forgery security issue exists within Rockwell Automation ThinManager® software due to the lack of input sanitization. Authenticated attackers can exploit this vulnerability by specifying external SMB paths, exposing the ThinServer® service account NTLM hash. | |||||
| CVE-2025-8772 | 1 Nukeviet | 1 Nukeviet | 2026-06-17 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Vinades NukeViet up to 4.5.06. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /admin/index.php?language=en&nv=upload of the component Module Handler. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | |||||
| CVE-2025-8680 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The B Slider- Gutenberg Slider Block for WP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in version less than, or equal to, 2.0.0 via the fs_api_request function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application which can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | |||||
| CVE-2025-8678 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM | ||
| The WP Crontrol plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to blind Server-Side Request Forgery in versions 1.17.0 to 1.19.1 via the 'wp_remote_request' function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | |||||
| CVE-2025-8675 | 1 Ai Seo Link Advisor Project | 1 Ai Seo Link Advisor | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Drupal AI SEO Link Advisor allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects AI SEO Link Advisor: from 0.0.0 before 1.0.6. | |||||
| CVE-2025-8529 | 2026-06-17 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 6.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability classified as critical was found in cloudfavorites favorites-web up to 1.3.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function getCollectLogoUrl of the file app/src/main/java/com/favorites/web/CollectController.java. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | |||||
| CVE-2025-8527 | 1 Exrick | 1 Xboot | 2026-06-17 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability was found in Exrick xboot up to 3.3.4. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file xboot-fast/src/main/java/cn/exrick/xboot/modules/base/controller/common/SecurityController.java of the component Swagger. The manipulation of the argument loginUrl leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | |||||