Total
2208 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-12905 | 1 Vebto | 1 Pixie - Image Editor | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 HIGH | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| Server Side Request Forgery vulnerability in Vebto Pixie Image Editor 1.4 and 1.7 allows remote attackers to disclose information or execute arbitrary code via the url parameter to Launderer.php. | |||||
| CVE-2017-9458 | 1 Paloaltonetworks | 1 Pan-os | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in the GlobalProtect internal and external gateway interface in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS before 6.1.18, 7.0.x before 7.0.17, 7.1.x before 7.1.12, and 8.0.x before 8.0.3 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, cause a denial of service, or conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2017-14585 | 1 Atlassian | 2 Hipchat Data Center, Hipchat Server | 2025-04-20 | 9.0 HIGH | 7.2 HIGH |
| A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability could lead to remote code execution for authenticated administrators. This issue was introduced in version 2.2.0 of Hipchat Server and version 3.0.0 of Hipchat Data Center. Versions of Hipchat Server starting with 2.2.0 and before 2.2.6 are affected by this vulnerability. Versions of Hipchat Data Center starting with 3.0.0 and before 3.1.0 are affected. | |||||
| CVE-2017-9355 | 1 Subsonic | 1 Subsonic | 2025-04-20 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| XML external entity (XXE) vulnerability in the import playlist feature in Subsonic 6.1.1 might allow remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted XSPF playlist file. | |||||
| CVE-2017-6130 | 1 F5 | 2 Ssl Intercept Iapp, Ssl Orchestrator | 2025-04-20 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| F5 SSL Intercept iApp 1.5.0 - 1.5.7 and SSL Orchestrator 2.0 is vulnerable to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack when deployed using the Dynamic Domain Bypass (DDB) feature feature plus SNAT Auto Map option for egress traffic. | |||||
| CVE-2024-55086 | 1 Getsimple-ce | 1 Getsimple Cms | 2025-04-18 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| In the GetSimple CMS CE 3.3.19 management page, Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) can be achieved in the plug-in download address in the backend management system. | |||||
| CVE-2024-33857 | 1 Logpoint | 1 Siem | 2025-04-18 | N/A | 9.6 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Logpoint before 7.4.0. Due to a lack of input validation on URLs in threat intelligence, an attacker with low-level access to the system can trigger Server Side Request Forgery. | |||||
| CVE-2024-48107 | 1 Sparkshop | 1 Sparkshop | 2025-04-18 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| SparkShop <=1.1.7 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This vulnerability allows attacks to scan ports on the Intranet or local network where the server resides, attack applications running on the Intranet or local network, or read metadata on the cloud server. | |||||
| CVE-2022-34269 | 1 Rws | 1 Worldserver | 2025-04-16 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in RWS WorldServer before 11.7.3. An authenticated, remote attacker can perform a ws-legacy/load_dtd?system_id= blind SSRF attack to deploy JSP code to the Apache Axis service running on the localhost interface, leading to command execution. | |||||
| CVE-2022-47635 | 1 Wildix | 1 Wms | 2025-04-16 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Wildix WMS 6 before 6.02.20221216, WMS 5 before 5.04.20221214, and WMS4 before 4.04.45396.23 allows Server-side request forgery (SSRF) via ZohoClient.php. | |||||
| CVE-2021-27312 | 1 Gleezcms | 1 Gleez Cms | 2025-04-16 | N/A | 9.4 CRITICAL |
| Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Gleez Cms 1.2.0, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code and obtain sensitive information via modules/gleez/classes/request.php. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32358 | 1 Zammad | 1 Zammad | 2025-04-15 | N/A | 4.0 MEDIUM |
| In Zammad 6.4.x before 6.4.2, SSRF can occur. Authenticated admin users can enable webhooks in Zammad, which are triggered as POST requests when certain conditions are met. If a webhook endpoint returned a redirect response, Zammad would follow it automatically with another GET request. This could be abused by an attacker to cause GET requests for example in the local network. | |||||
| CVE-2022-37313 | 1 Open-xchange | 1 Open-xchange Appsuite | 2025-04-14 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| OX App Suite through 7.10.6 allows SSRF because the anti-SSRF protection mechanism only checks the first DNS AA or AAAA record. | |||||
| CVE-2016-5968 | 1 Ibm | 1 Tealeaf Customer Experience | 2025-04-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| The Replay Server in IBM Tealeaf Customer Experience 8.x before 8.7.1.8847 FP10, 8.8.x before 8.8.0.9049 FP9, 9.0.0 and 9.0.1 before 9.0.1.1117 FP5, 9.0.1A before 9.0.1.5108 FP5, 9.0.2 before 9.0.2.1223 FP3, and 9.0.2A before 9.0.2.5224 FP3 allows remote attackers to conduct SSRF attacks via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4046 | 1 Open-xchange | 1 Open-xchange Appsuite | 2025-04-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.8 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in Open-Xchange OX App Suite before 7.8.1-rev11. The API to configure external mail accounts can be abused to map and access network components within the trust boundary of the operator. Users can inject arbitrary hosts and ports to API calls. Depending on the response type, content and latency, information about existence of hosts and services can be gathered. Attackers can get internal configuration information about the infrastructure of an operator to prepare subsequent attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4029 | 2 Debian, Wordpress | 2 Debian Linux, Wordpress | 2025-04-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 8.6 HIGH |
| WordPress before 4.5 does not consider octal and hexadecimal IP address formats when determining an intranet address, which allows remote attackers to bypass an intended SSRF protection mechanism via a crafted address. | |||||
| CVE-2016-7964 | 1 Dokuwiki | 1 Dokuwiki | 2025-04-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 8.6 HIGH |
| The sendRequest method in HTTPClient Class in file /inc/HTTPClient.php in DokuWiki 2016-06-26a and older, when media file fetching is enabled, has no way to restrict access to private networks. This allows users to scan ports of internal networks via SSRF, such as 10.0.0.1/8, 172.16.0.0/12, and 192.168.0.0/16. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4374 | 1 Hp | 1 Release Control | 2025-04-12 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 7.7 HIGH |
| HPE Release Control (RC) 9.13, 9.20, and 9.21 before 9.21.0005 p4 allows remote authenticated users to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks, and consequently obtain sensitive information or cause a denial of service, via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9752 | 1 S9y | 1 Serendipity | 2025-04-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 8.6 HIGH |
| In Serendipity before 2.0.5, an attacker can bypass SSRF protection by using a malformed IP address (e.g., http://127.1) or a 30x (aka Redirection) HTTP status code. | |||||
| CVE-2016-6483 | 1 Vbulletin | 1 Vbulletin | 2025-04-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 8.6 HIGH |
| The media-file upload feature in vBulletin before 3.8.7 Patch Level 6, 3.8.8 before Patch Level 2, 3.8.9 before Patch Level 1, 4.x before 4.2.2 Patch Level 6, 4.2.3 before Patch Level 2, 5.x before 5.2.0 Patch Level 3, 5.2.1 before Patch Level 1, and 5.2.2 before Patch Level 1 allows remote attackers to conduct SSRF attacks via a crafted URL that results in a Redirection HTTP status code. | |||||