Total
1567 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-27896 | 1 Sap | 1 Businessobjects Business Intelligence | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform - version 420, 430, an attacker can control a malicious BOE server, forcing the application server to connect to its own CMS, leading to a high impact on availability. | |||||
| CVE-2023-27586 | 1 Courtbouillon | 1 Cairosvg | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| CairoSVG is an SVG converter based on Cairo, a 2D graphics library. Prior to version 2.7.0, Cairo can send requests to external hosts when processing SVG files. A malicious actor could send a specially crafted SVG file that allows them to perform a server-side request forgery or denial of service. Version 2.7.0 disables CairoSVG's ability to access other files online by default. | |||||
| CVE-2023-27271 | 1 Sap | 1 Businessobjects Business Intelligence Platform | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform (Web Services) - versions 420, 430, an attacker can control a malicious BOE server, forcing the application server to connect to its own admintools, leading to a high impact on availability. | |||||
| CVE-2023-26492 | 1 Monospace | 1 Directus | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.0 MEDIUM |
| Directus is a real-time API and App dashboard for managing SQL database content. Directus is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) when importing a file from a remote web server (POST to `/files/import`). An attacker can bypass the security controls by performing a DNS rebinding attack and view sensitive data from internal servers or perform a local port scan. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to access highly sensitive internal server(s) and steal sensitive information. This issue was fixed in version 9.23.0. | |||||
| CVE-2023-26459 | 1 Sap | 1 Netweaver Application Server Abap | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| Due to improper input controls In SAP NetWeaver AS for ABAP and ABAP Platform - versions 700, 701, 702, 731, 740, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755, 756, 757, 791, an attacker authenticated as a non-administrative user can craft a request which will trigger the application server to send a request to an arbitrary URL which can reveal, modify or make unavailable non-sensitive information, leading to low impact on Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability. | |||||
| CVE-2023-26442 | 1 Open-xchange | 1 Open-xchange Appsuite Office | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 3.2 LOW |
| In case Cacheservice was configured to use a sproxyd object-storage backend, it would follow HTTP redirects issued by that backend. An attacker with access to a local or restricted network with the capability to intercept and replay HTTP requests to sproxyd (or who is in control of the sproxyd service) could perform a server-side request-forgery attack and make Cacheservice connect to unexpected resources. We have disabled the ability to follow HTTP redirects when connecting to sproxyd resources. No publicly available exploits are known. | |||||
| CVE-2023-26438 | 1 Open-xchange | 1 Open-xchange Appsuite Backend | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| External service lookups for a number of protocols were vulnerable to a time-of-check/time-of-use (TOCTOU) weakness, involving the JDK DNS cache. Attackers that were timing DNS cache expiry correctly were able to inject configuration that would bypass existing network deny-lists. Attackers could exploit this weakness to discover the existence of restricted network infrastructure and service availability. Improvements were made to include deny-lists not only during the check of the provided connection data, but also during use. No publicly available exploits are known. | |||||
| CVE-2023-26435 | 1 Open-xchange | 1 Open-xchange Appsuite Backend | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.0 MEDIUM |
| It was possible to call filesystem and network references using the local LibreOffice instance using manipulated ODT documents. Attackers could discover restricted network topology and services as well as including local files with read permissions of the open-xchange system user. This was limited to specific file-types, like images. We have improved existing content filters and validators to avoid including any local resources. No publicly available exploits are known. | |||||
| CVE-2023-26431 | 1 Open-xchange | 1 Open-xchange Appsuite Backend | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.0 MEDIUM |
| IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses did not get recognized as "local" by the code and a connection attempt is made. Attackers with access to user accounts could use this to bypass existing deny-list functionality and trigger requests to restricted network infrastructure to gain insight about topology and running services. We now respect possible IPV4-mapped IPv6 addresses when checking if contained in a deny-list. No publicly available exploits are known. | |||||
| CVE-2023-26366 | 1 Adobe | 2 Commerce, Magento | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.7-beta1 (and earlier), 2.4.6-p2 (and earlier), 2.4.5-p4 (and earlier) and 2.4.4-p5 (and earlier) are affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. A high-privileged authenticated attacker can force the application to make arbitrary requests via injection of arbitrary URLs. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction, scope is changed due to the fact that an attacker can enforce file read outside the application's path boundary. | |||||
| CVE-2023-25753 | 1 Apache | 1 Shenyu | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| There exists an SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) vulnerability located at the /sandbox/proxyGateway endpoint. This vulnerability allows us to manipulate arbitrary requests and retrieve corresponding responses by inputting any URL into the requestUrl parameter. Of particular concern is our ability to exert control over the HTTP method, cookies, IP address, and headers. This effectively grants us the capability to dispatch complete HTTP requests to hosts of our choosing. This issue affects Apache ShenYu: 2.5.1. Upgrade to Apache ShenYu 2.6.0 or apply patch https://github.com/apache/shenyu/pull/4776 . | |||||
| CVE-2023-25609 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortianalyzer, Fortimanager | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability [CWE-918] in FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer GUI 7.2.0 through 7.2.1, 7.0.0 through 7.0.6, 6.4.8 through 6.4.11 may allow a remote and authenticated attacker to access unauthorized files and services on the system via specially crafted web requests. | |||||
| CVE-2023-25557 | 1 Datahub Project | 1 Datahub | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| DataHub is an open-source metadata platform. The DataHub frontend acts as a proxy able to forward any REST or GraphQL requests to the backend. The goal of this proxy is to perform authentication if needed and forward HTTP requests to the DataHub Metadata Store (GMS). It has been discovered that the proxy does not adequately construct the URL when forwarding data to GMS, allowing external users to reroute requests from the DataHub Frontend to any arbitrary hosts. As a result attackers may be able to reroute a request from originating from the frontend proxy to any other server and return the result. This vulnerability was discovered and reported by the GitHub Security lab and is tracked as GHSL-2022-076. | |||||
| CVE-2023-25230 | 1 Loonflow Project | 1 Loonflow | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in loonflow r2.0.14 allows attackers to force the application to make arbitrary requests via manipulation of the hook_url parameter. | |||||
| CVE-2023-25195 | 1 Apache | 1 Fineract | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache Fineract. Authorized users with limited permissions can gain access to server and may be able to use server for any outbound traffic. This issue affects Apache Fineract: from 1.4 through 1.8.3. | |||||
| CVE-2023-25162 | 1 Nextcloud | 1 Nextcloud Server | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Nextcloud Server is the file server software for Nextcloud, a self-hosted productivity platform. Nextcloud Server prior to 24.0.8 and 23.0.12 and Nextcloud Enterprise server prior to 24.0.8 and 23.0.12 are vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). Attackers can leverage enclosed alphanumeric payloads to bypass IP filters and gain SSRF, which would allow an attacker to read crucial metadata if the server is hosted on the AWS platform. Nextcloud Server 24.0.8 and 23.0.2 and Nextcloud Enterprise Server 24.0.8 and 23.0.12 contain a patch for this issue. No known workarounds are available. | |||||
| CVE-2023-24954 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Sharepoint Enterprise Server, Sharepoint Server, Windows 10 1507 and 11 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Microsoft SharePoint Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2023-24515 | 1 Pandorafms | 1 Pandora Fms | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.2 MEDIUM |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in API checker of Pandora FMS. Application does not have a check on the URL scheme used while retrieving API URL. Rather than validating the http/https scheme, the application allows other scheme such as file, which could allow a malicious user to fetch internal file content. This issue affects Pandora FMS v767 version and prior versions on all platforms. | |||||
| CVE-2023-23943 | 1 Nextcloud | 1 Mail | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.0 MEDIUM |
| Nextcloud mail is an email app for the nextcloud home server platform. In affected versions the SMTP, IMAP and Sieve host fields allowed to scan for internal services and servers reachable from within the local network of the Nextcloud Server. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Maill app is upgraded to 1.15.0 or 2.2.2. The only known workaround for this issue is to completely disable the nextcloud mail app. | |||||
| CVE-2023-22936 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Cloud Platform | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 8.1.13, 8.2.10, and 9.0.4, the ‘search_listener’ parameter in a search allows for a blind server-side request forgery (SSRF) by an authenticated user. The initiator of the request cannot see the response without the presence of an additional vulnerability within the environment. | |||||