Total
2662 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-0807 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| The Frontis Blocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.6. This is due to insufficient restriction on the 'url' parameter in the 'template_proxy' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application via the '/template-proxy/' and '/proxy-image/' endpoint. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0746 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.4 MEDIUM | ||
| The AI Engine plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.2 via the 'get_audio' function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services, if "Public API" is enabled in the plugin settings, and 'allow_url_fopen' is set to 'On' on the server. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0745 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM | ||
| The User Language Switch plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.10 due to missing URL validation on the 'download_language()' function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0688 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.4 MEDIUM | ||
| The Webmention plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.6.2 via the 'Tools::read' function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0686 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| The Webmention plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.6.2 in the 'MF2::parse_authorpage' function via the 'Receiver::post' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0682 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 2.2 LOW | ||
| The Church Admin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.0.28 due to insufficient validation of user-supplied URLs in the 'audio_url' parameter. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0649 | 2026-06-17 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 4.7 MEDIUM | ||
| A security vulnerability has been detected in invoiceninja up to 5.12.38. The affected element is the function copy of the file /app/Jobs/Util/Import.php of the component Migration Import. The manipulation of the argument company_logo leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0632 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM | ||
| The Fluent Forms Pro Add On Pack plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.1.12 via the 'saveDataSource' function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0613 | 1 Thelibrarian | 1 The Librarian | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The Librarian contains an internal port scanning vulnerability, facilitated by the `web_fetch` tool, which can be used with SSRF-style behavior to perform GET requests to internal IP addresses and services, enabling scanning of the Hertzner cloud environment that TheLibrarian uses. The vendor has fixed the vulnerability in all affected versions. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0600 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Sonatype Nexus Repository 3 versions 3.0.0 and later allows authenticated administrators to configure proxy repositories with URLs that can access unintended network destinations, potentially including cloud metadata services and internal network resources. A workaround configuration is available starting in version 3.88.0, but the product remains vulnerable by default. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0560 | 1 Lollms | 1 Lollms | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in parisneo/lollms versions prior to 2.2.0, specifically in the `/api/files/export-content` endpoint. The `_download_image_to_temp()` function in `backend/routers/files.py` fails to validate user-controlled URLs, allowing attackers to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints. This vulnerability can lead to internal network access, cloud metadata access, information disclosure, port scanning, and potentially remote code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0532 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.6 HIGH | ||
| External Control of File Name or Path (CWE-73) combined with Server-Side Request Forgery (CWE-918) can allow an attacker to cause arbitrary file disclosure through a specially crafted credentials JSON payload in the Google Gemini connector configuration. This requires an attacker to have authenticated access with privileges sufficient to create or modify connectors (Alerts & Connectors: All). The server processes a configuration without proper validation, allowing for arbitrary network requests and for arbitrary file reads. | |||||
| CVE-2026-0258 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the IKEv2 implementation of Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS® software allows an unauthenticated attacker to cause the firewall to send network requests to unintended destinations or cause a denial of service (DoS) condition. Panorama, Cloud NGFW and Prisma® Access are not impacted by these vulnerabilities. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9975 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.8 MEDIUM | ||
| The WP Scraper plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.8.1 via the wp_scraper_extract_content function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. On Cloud instances, this issue allows for metadata retrieving. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9960 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| A restriction bypass vulnerability in is-localhost-ip could allow attackers to perform Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). This issue affects is-localhost-ip: 2.0.0. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9868 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the Remote Browser Plugin in Sonatype Nexus Repository 2.x up to and including 2.15.2 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to exfiltrate proxy repository credentials via crafted HTTP requests. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9862 | 1 Ghost | 1 Ghost | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Ghost allows an attacker to access internal resources.This issue affects Ghost: from 6.0.0 through 6.0.8, from 5.99.0 through 5.130.3. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9821 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 2.7 LOW | ||
| SummaryUsers with webhook permissions can conduct SSRF via webhooks. If they have permission to view the webhook logs, the (partial) request response is also disclosed DetailsWhen sending webhooks, the destination is not validated, causing SSRF. ImpactBypass of firewalls to interact with internal services. See https://owasp.org/Top10/A10_2021-Server-Side_Request_Forgery_%28SSRF%29/ for more potential impact. Resources https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Server_Side_Request_Forgery_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html for more information on SSRF and its fix. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9805 | 1 Sim | 1 Sim | 2026-06-17 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability was found in SimStudioAI sim up to 51b1e97fa22c48d144aef75f8ca31a74ad2cfed2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file apps/sim/app/api/proxy/image/route.ts. The manipulation results in server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made public and could be used. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The patch is identified as 3424a338b763115f0269b209e777608e4cd31785. Applying a patch is advised to resolve this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2025-9799 | 1 Langfuse | 1 Langfuse | 2026-06-17 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 5.0 MEDIUM |
| A security flaw has been discovered in Langfuse up to 3.88.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function promptChangeEventSourcing of the file web/src/features/prompts/server/routers/promptRouter.ts of the component Webhook Handler. Performing manipulation results in server-side request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. | |||||