Total
2645 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-31527 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.4 MEDIUM | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Kishan WP Link Preview wp-link-preview allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Link Preview: from n/a through <= 1.4.1. | |||||
| CVE-2025-31490 | 1 Agpt | 1 Autogpt Platform | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| AutoGPT is a platform that allows users to create, deploy, and manage continuous artificial intelligence agents that automate complex workflows. Prior to 0.6.1, AutoGPT allows SSRF due to DNS Rebinding in requests wrapper. AutoGPT is built with a wrapper around Python's requests library, hardening the application against SSRF. The code for this wrapper can be found in autogpt_platform/backend/backend/util/request.py. The requested hostname of a URL which is being requested is validated, ensuring that it does not resolve to any local ipv4 or ipv6 addresses. However, this check is not sufficient, as a DNS server may initially respond with a non-blocked address, with a TTL of 0. This means that the initial resolution would appear as a non-blocked address. In this case, validate_url() will return the url as successful. After validate_url() has successfully returned the url, the url is then passed to the real request() function. When the real request() function is called with the validated url, request() will once again resolve the address of the hostname, because the record will not have been cached (due to TTL 0). This resolution may be in the "invalid range". This type of attack is called a "DNS Rebinding Attack". This vulnerability is fixed in 0.6.1. | |||||
| CVE-2025-31117 | 1 Open-emr | 1 Openemr | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| OpenEMR is a free and open source electronic health records and medical practice management application. An Out-of-Band Server-Side Request Forgery (OOB SSRF) vulnerability was identified in OpenEMR, allowing an attacker to force the server to make unauthorized requests to external or internal resources. this attack does not return a direct response but can be exploited through DNS or HTTP interactions to exfiltrate sensitive information. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.0.3.1. | |||||
| CVE-2025-31116 | 1 Opensecurity | 1 Mobile Security Framework | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is a pen-testing, malware analysis and security assessment framework capable of performing static and dynamic analysis. The mitigation for CVE-2024-29190 in valid_host() uses socket.gethostbyname(), which is vulnerable to SSRF abuse using DNS rebinding technique. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.3.2. | |||||
| CVE-2025-31076 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.9 MEDIUM | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WP Compress WP Compress for MainWP wp-compress-mainwp allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Compress for MainWP: from n/a through <= 6.30.03. | |||||
| CVE-2025-31009 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Jan Boddez IndieBlocks indieblocks allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects IndieBlocks: from n/a through <= 0.13.1. | |||||
| CVE-2025-30997 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SmartDataSoft Car Repair Services car-repair-services allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Car Repair Services: from n/a through <= 5.0. | |||||
| CVE-2025-30976 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.9 MEDIUM | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in wpdive Nexa Blocks nexa-blocks allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Nexa Blocks: from n/a through <= 1.1.1. | |||||
| CVE-2025-30964 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in ThemeGoods Photography photography allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Photography: from n/a through < 7.7.6. | |||||
| CVE-2025-30914 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.4 MEDIUM | ||
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Roxnor Metform metform allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Metform: from n/a through <= 3.9.2. | |||||
| CVE-2025-30680 | 2 Microsoft, Trendmicro | 2 Windows, Apex Central | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| A Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex Central (SaaS) could allow an attacker to manipulate certain parameters leading to information disclosure on affected installations. Please note: this vulnerability only affects the SaaS instance of Apex Central - customers that automatically apply Trend Micro's monthly maintenance releases to the SaaS instance do not have to take any further action. | |||||
| CVE-2025-30679 | 2 Microsoft, Trendmicro | 2 Windows, Apex Central | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex Central (on-premise) modOSCE component could allow an attacker to manipulate certain parameters leading to information disclosure on affected installations. | |||||
| CVE-2025-30678 | 2 Microsoft, Trendmicro | 2 Windows, Apex Central | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| A Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex Central (on-premise) modTMSM component could allow an attacker to manipulate certain parameters leading to information disclosure on affected installations. | |||||
| CVE-2025-30220 | 2 Geotools, Osgeo | 3 Geotools, Geonetwork, Geoserver | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| GeoServer is an open source server that allows users to share and edit geospatial data. GeoTools Schema class use of Eclipse XSD library to represent schema data structure is vulnerable to XML External Entity (XXE) exploit. This impacts whoever exposes XML processing with gt-xsd-core involved in parsing, when the documents carry a reference to an external XML schema. The gt-xsd-core Schemas class is not using the EntityResolver provided by the ParserHandler (if any was configured). This also impacts users of gt-wfs-ng DataStore where the ENTITY_RESOLVER connection parameter was not being used as intended. This vulnerability is fixed in GeoTools 33.1, 32.3, 31.7, and 28.6.1, GeoServer 2.27.1, 2.26.3, and 2.25.7, and GeoNetwork 4.4.8 and 4.2.13. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2997 | 1 Zhangyanbo2007 | 1 Youkefu | 2026-06-17 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 6.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability was found in zhangyanbo2007 youkefu 4.2.0. It has been classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function of the file /res/url. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2987 | 1 Ibm | 1 Maximo Asset Management | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 3.8 LOW |
| IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.6.1.3 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2940 | 1 Wpmanageninja | 1 Ninja Tables | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| The Ninja Tables – Easy Data Table Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.0.18 via the args[url] parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2835 | 1 Zhyd | 1 Oneblog | 2026-06-17 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability was found in zhangyd-c OneBlog up to 2.3.9. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function autoLink of the file com/zyd/blog/controller/RestApiController.java. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2828 | 1 Langchain | 1 Langchain | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the RequestsToolkit component of the langchain-community package (specifically, langchain_community.agent_toolkits.openapi.toolkit.RequestsToolkit) in langchain-ai/langchain version 0.0.27. This vulnerability occurs because the toolkit does not enforce restrictions on requests to remote internet addresses, allowing it to also access local addresses. As a result, an attacker could exploit this flaw to perform port scans, access local services, retrieve instance metadata from cloud environments (e.g., Azure, AWS), and interact with servers on the local network. This issue has been fixed in version 0.0.28. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2691 | 1 Nossrf Project | 1 Nossrf | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.2 HIGH |
| Versions of the package nossrf before 1.0.4 are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) where an attacker can provide a hostname that resolves to a local or reserved IP address space and bypass the SSRF protection mechanism. | |||||