Total
20 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2025-55736 | 2025-08-19 | N/A | N/A | ||
flaskBlog is a blog app built with Flask. In 2.8.0 and earlier, an arbitrary user can change his role to "admin", giving its relative privileges (e.g. delete users, posts, comments etc.). The problem is in the routes/adminPanelUsers file. | |||||
CVE-2025-55735 | 2025-08-19 | N/A | N/A | ||
flaskBlog is a blog app built with Flask. In 2.8.0 and earlier, when creating a post, there's no validation of the content of the post stored in the variable "postContent". The vulnerability arises when displaying the content of the post using the | safe filter, that tells the engine to not escape the rendered content. This can lead to a stored XSS inside the content of the post. The code that causes the problem is in template/routes.html. | |||||
CVE-2024-13974 | 2025-07-22 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH | ||
A business logic vulnerability in the Up2Date component of Sophos Firewall older than version 21.0 MR1 (20.0.1) can lead to attackers controlling the firewall’s DNS environment to achieve remote code execution. | |||||
CVE-2025-49827 | 2025-07-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
Conjur provides secrets management and application identity for infrastructure. Conjur OSS versions 1.19.5 through 1.22.0 and Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted (formerly known as Conjur Enterprise) 13.1 through 13.5 and 13.6 are vulnerable to bypass of the IAM authenticator. An attacker who can manipulate the headers signed by AWS can take advantage of a malformed regular expression to redirect the authentication validation request that Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted sends to AWS to a malicious server controlled by the attacker. This redirection could result in a bypass of the Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted IAM Authenticator, granting the attacker the permissions granted to the client whose request was manipulated. This issue affects both Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted (formerly Conjur Enterprise) and Conjur OSS. Conjur OSS version 1.22.1 and Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted versions 13.5.1 and 13.6.1 fix the issue. | |||||
CVE-2024-45654 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Security Qradar Edr, Linux Kernel | 2025-07-16 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
IBM Security ReaQta 3.12 could allow an authenticated user to perform unauthorized actions due to reliance on untrusted inputs. | |||||
CVE-2024-55354 | 2025-04-10 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
Lucee before 5.4.7.3 LTS and 6 before 6.1.1.118, when an attacker can place files on the server, is vulnerable to a protection mechanism failure that can let an attacker run code that would be expected to be blocked and access resources that would be expected to be protected. | |||||
CVE-2025-0117 | 2025-03-12 | N/A | N/A | ||
A reliance on untrusted input for a security decision in the GlobalProtect app on Windows devices potentially enables a locally authenticated non-administrative Windows user to escalate their privileges to NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM. GlobalProtect App on macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, Chrome OS and GlobalProtect UWP App are not affected. | |||||
CVE-2024-11146 | 2025-02-20 | N/A | 6.3 MEDIUM | ||
TrueFiling is a collaborative, web-based electronic filing system where attorneys, paralegals, court reporters and self-represented filers collect public legal documentation into cases. TrueFiling is an entirely cloud-hosted application. Prior to version 3.1.112.19, TrueFiling trusted some client-controlled identifiers passed in URL requests to retrieve information. Platform users must self-register for an account, and once authenticated, could manipulate those identifiers to gain partial access to case information and the ability to partially change user access to case information. This vulnerability was addressed in version 3.1.112.19 and all instances were updated by 2024-11-08. | |||||
CVE-2025-1126 | 2025-02-11 | N/A | 9.3 CRITICAL | ||
A Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision vulnerability has been identified in the Lexmark Print Management Client. | |||||
CVE-2025-24369 | 2025-01-27 | N/A | N/A | ||
Anubis is a tool that allows administrators to protect bots against AI scrapers through bot-checking heuristics and a proof-of-work challenge to discourage scraping from multiple IP addresses. Anubis allows attackers to bypass the bot protection by requesting a challenge, formulates any nonce (such as 42069), and then passes the challenge with difficulty zero. Commit e09d0226a628f04b1d80fd83bee777894a45cd02 fixes this behavior by not using a client-specified difficulty value. | |||||
CVE-2024-52327 | 2025-01-23 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
The cloud service used by ECOVACS robot lawnmowers and vacuums allows authenticated attackers to bypass the PIN entry required to access the live video feed. | |||||
CVE-2024-9310 | 2025-01-22 | N/A | N/A | ||
By utilizing software-defined radios and a custom low-latency processing pipeline, RF signals with spoofed location data can be transmitted to aircraft targets. This can lead to the appearance of fake aircraft on displays and potentially trigger undesired Resolution Advisories (RAs). | |||||
CVE-2024-28824 | 1 Checkmk | 1 Checkmk | 2024-12-04 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
Least privilege violation and reliance on untrusted inputs in the mk_informix Checkmk agent plugin before Checkmk 2.3.0b4 (beta), 2.2.0p24, 2.1.0p41 and 2.0.0 (EOL) allows local users to escalate privileges. | |||||
CVE-2024-28829 | 1 Checkmk | 1 Checkmk | 2024-12-03 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
Least privilege violation and reliance on untrusted inputs in the mk_informix Checkmk agent plugin before Checkmk 2.3.0p12, 2.2.0p32, 2.1.0p47 and 2.0.0 (EOL) allows local users to escalate privileges. | |||||
CVE-2024-29039 | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 9.0 CRITICAL | ||
tpm2 is the source repository for the Trusted Platform Module (TPM2.0) tools. This vulnerability allows attackers to manipulate tpm2_checkquote outputs by altering the TPML_PCR_SELECTION in the PCR input file. As a result, digest values are incorrectly mapped to PCR slots and banks, providing a misleading picture of the TPM state. This issue has been patched in version 5.7. | |||||
CVE-2023-45128 | 1 Gofiber | 1 Fiber | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 10.0 CRITICAL |
Fiber is an express inspired web framework written in Go. A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been identified in the application, which allows an attacker to inject arbitrary values and forge malicious requests on behalf of a user. This vulnerability can allow an attacker to inject arbitrary values without any authentication, or perform various malicious actions on behalf of an authenticated user, potentially compromising the security and integrity of the application. The vulnerability is caused by improper validation and enforcement of CSRF tokens within the application. This issue has been addressed in version 2.50.0 and users are advised to upgrade. Users should take additional security measures like captchas or Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) and set Session cookies with SameSite=Lax or SameSite=Secure, and the Secure and HttpOnly attributes as defense in depth measures. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | |||||
CVE-2021-31999 | 1 Rancher | 1 Rancher | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
A Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision vulnerability in Rancher allows users in the cluster to act as others users in the cluster by forging the "Impersonate-User" or "Impersonate-Group" headers. This issue affects: Rancher versions prior to 2.5.9. Rancher versions prior to 2.4.16. | |||||
CVE-2024-51561 | 1 63moons | 2 Aero, Wave 2.0 | 2024-11-06 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
This vulnerability exists in Aero due to improper implementation of OTP validation mechanism in certain API endpoints. An authenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by intercepting and manipulating the responses exchanged during the second factor authentication process. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to bypass OTP verification for accessing other user accounts. | |||||
CVE-2024-21510 | 2024-11-01 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM | ||
Versions of the package sinatra from 0.0.0 are vulnerable to Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision via the X-Forwarded-Host (XFH) header. When making a request to a method with redirect applied, it is possible to trigger an Open Redirect Attack by inserting an arbitrary address into this header. If used for caching purposes, such as with servers like Nginx, or as a reverse proxy, without handling the X-Forwarded-Host header, attackers can potentially exploit Cache Poisoning or Routing-based SSRF. | |||||
CVE-2024-7005 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2024-08-07 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Safe Browsing in Google Chrome prior to 127.0.6533.72 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to bypass discretionary access control via a malicious file. (Chromium security severity: Low) |