Total
12054 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-1124 | 6 Canonical, Debian, Opensuse and 3 more | 9 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Leap and 6 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| procps-ng before version 3.3.15 is vulnerable to multiple integer overflows leading to a heap corruption in file2strvec function. This allows a privilege escalation for a local attacker who can create entries in procfs by starting processes, which could result in crashes or arbitrary code execution in proc utilities run by other users. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1068 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Linux and 1 more | 10 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Linux Kernel and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in the Linux 4.x kernel's implementation of 32-bit syscall interface for bridging. This allowed a privileged user to arbitrarily write to a limited range of kernel memory. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1046 | 1 Powerdns | 1 Pdns | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| pdns before version 4.1.2 is vulnerable to a buffer overflow in dnsreplay. In the dnsreplay tool provided with PowerDNS Authoritative, replaying a specially crafted PCAP file can trigger a stack-based buffer overflow, leading to a crash and potentially arbitrary code execution. This buffer overflow only occurs when the -ecs-stamp option of dnsreplay is used. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1023 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Chakracore, Edge, Windows 10 and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that Microsoft browsers access objects in memory, aka "Microsoft Browser Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1022 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Chakracore, Edge, Internet Explorer | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft browsers, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects ChakraCore, Internet Explorer 11, Microsoft Edge. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0945, CVE-2018-0946, CVE-2018-0951, CVE-2018-0953, CVE-2018-0954, CVE-2018-0955, CVE-2018-8114, CVE-2018-8122, CVE-2018-8128, CVE-2018-8137, CVE-2018-8139. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1020 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Internet Explorer improperly accesses objects in memory, aka "Internet Explorer Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Internet Explorer 9, Internet Explorer 11, Internet Explorer 10. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0870, CVE-2018-0991, CVE-2018-0997, CVE-2018-1018. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1019 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Edge, Windows 10 | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka "Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Microsoft Edge, ChakraCore. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0979, CVE-2018-0980, CVE-2018-0990, CVE-2018-0993, CVE-2018-0994, CVE-2018-0995. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1018 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Internet Explorer improperly accesses objects in memory, aka "Internet Explorer Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Internet Explorer 11. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0870, CVE-2018-0991, CVE-2018-0997, CVE-2018-1020. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1004 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the VBScript engine handles objects in memory, aka "Windows VBScript Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This affects Windows 7, Windows Server 2012 R2, Internet Explorer 9, Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2012, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows 10. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1001 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Internet Explorer, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability." This affects Internet Explorer 9, Internet Explorer 11, Internet Explorer 10. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0988, CVE-2018-0996. | |||||
| CVE-2018-1000 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Internet Explorer, Windows 10, Windows 7 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 2.6 LOW | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the way that the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Internet Explorer, aka "Scripting Engine Information Disclosure Vulnerability." This affects Internet Explorer 9, Internet Explorer 11, Internet Explorer 10. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2018-0981, CVE-2018-0987, CVE-2018-0989. | |||||
| CVE-2018-19931 | 3 Canonical, Gnu, Netapp | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Binutils, Vasa Provider | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in the Binary File Descriptor (BFD) library (aka libbfd), as distributed in GNU Binutils through 2.31. There is a heap-based buffer overflow in bfd_elf32_swap_phdr_in in elfcode.h because the number of program headers is not restricted. | |||||
| CVE-2018-19762 | 1 Libsixel Project | 1 Libsixel | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| There is a heap-based buffer overflow at fromsixel.c (function: image_buffer_resize) in libsixel 1.8.2 that will cause a denial of service or possibly unspecified other impact. | |||||
| CVE-2018-19716 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc, Mac Os X and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.008.20081 and earlier, 2019.008.20080 and earlier, 2019.008.20081 and earlier, 2017.011.30106 and earlier version, 2017.011.30105 and earlier version, 2015.006.30457 and earlier, and 2015.006.30456 and earlier have a heap overflow vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2018-19702 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 4 Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc, Mac Os X and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Adobe Acrobat and Reader versions 2019.008.20081 and earlier, 2019.008.20080 and earlier, 2019.008.20081 and earlier, 2017.011.30106 and earlier version, 2017.011.30105 and earlier version, 2015.006.30457 and earlier, and 2015.006.30456 and earlier have an out-of-bounds write vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2018-19655 | 2 Dcraw Project, Suse | 3 Dcraw, Suse Linux Enterprise Desktop, Suse Linux Enterprise Server | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A stack-based buffer overflow in the find_green() function of dcraw through 9.28, as used in ufraw-batch and many other products, may allow a remote attacker to cause a control-flow hijack, denial-of-service, or unspecified other impact via a maliciously crafted raw photo file. | |||||
| CVE-2018-19650 | 1 Antiy | 1 Anti Virus Lab Atool | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Local attackers can trigger a stack-based buffer overflow on vulnerable installations of Antiy-AVL ATool security management v1.0.0.22. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the processing of IOCTL 0x80002000 by the IRPFile.sys Antiy-AVL ATool kernel driver. The bug is caused by failure to properly validate the length of the user-supplied data, which results in a kernel stack buffer overflow. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the kernel, which could lead to privilege escalation and a failed exploit could lead to denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2018-19623 | 2 Debian, Wireshark | 2 Debian Linux, Wireshark | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In Wireshark 2.6.0 to 2.6.4 and 2.4.0 to 2.4.10, the LBMPDM dissector could crash. In addition, a remote attacker could write arbitrary data to any memory locations before the packet-scoped memory. This was addressed in epan/dissectors/packet-lbmpdm.c by disallowing certain negative values. | |||||
| CVE-2018-19540 | 3 Debian, Jasper Project, Suse | 4 Debian Linux, Jasper, Linux Enterprise Desktop and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in JasPer 1.900.8, 1.900.9, 1.900.10, 1.900.11, 1.900.12, 1.900.13, 1.900.14, 1.900.15, 1.900.16, 1.900.17, 1.900.18, 1.900.19, 1.900.20, 1.900.21, 1.900.22, 1.900.23, 1.900.24, 1.900.25, 1.900.26, 1.900.27, 1.900.28, 1.900.29, 1.900.30, 1.900.31, 2.0.0, 2.0.1, 2.0.2, 2.0.3, 2.0.4, 2.0.5, 2.0.6, 2.0.7, 2.0.8, 2.0.9, 2.0.10, 2.0.11, 2.0.12, 2.0.13, 2.0.14, 2.0.15, 2.0.16. There is a heap-based buffer overflow of size 1 in the function jas_icctxtdesc_input in libjasper/base/jas_icc.c. | |||||
| CVE-2018-19503 | 1 Audiocoding | 1 Freeware Advanced Audio Decoder 2 | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Freeware Advanced Audio Decoder 2 (FAAD2) 2.8.1. There was a stack-based buffer overflow in the function calculate_gain() in libfaad/sbr_hfadj.c. | |||||