Total
898 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-5526 | 1 Vmware | 1 Workstation | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| VMware Workstation (15.x before 15.1.0) contains a DLL hijacking issue because some DLL files are improperly loaded by the application. Successful exploitation of this issue may allow attackers with normal user privileges to escalate their privileges to administrator on a windows host where Workstation is installed. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5443 | 4 Haxx, Microsoft, Netapp and 1 more | 10 Curl, Windows, Oncommand Insight and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| A non-privileged user or program can put code and a config file in a known non-privileged path (under C:/usr/local/) that will make curl <= 7.65.1 automatically run the code (as an openssl "engine") on invocation. If that curl is invoked by a privileged user it can do anything it wants. | |||||
| CVE-2019-5245 | 1 Huawei | 1 Hisuite | 2024-11-21 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| HiSuite 9.1.0.300 versions and earlier contains a DLL hijacking vulnerability. This vulnerability exists due to some DLL file is loaded by HiSuite improperly. And it allows an attacker to load this DLL file of the attacker's choosing that could execute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2019-4588 | 2 Ibm, Microsoft | 2 Db2, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| IBM Db2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows (includes Db2 Connect Server) 9.7, 10.1, 10.5, 11.1, and 11.5 could allow a local user to execute arbitrary code and conduct DLL hijacking attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2019-4473 | 1 Ibm | 1 Java | 2024-11-21 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Multiple binaries in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 7, 7R, and 8 on the AIX platform use insecure absolute RPATHs, which may facilitate code injection and privilege elevation by local users. IBM X-Force ID: 163984. | |||||
| CVE-2019-4447 | 3 Ibm, Linux, Microsoft | 3 Db2 High Performance Unload Load, Linux Kernel, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| IBM DB2 High Performance Unload load for LUW 6.1, 6.1.0.1, 6.1.0.1 IF1, 6.1.0.2, 6.1.0.2 IF1, and 6.1.0.1 IF2 db2hpum_debug is a setuid root binary which trusts the PATH environment variable. A low privileged user can execute arbitrary commands as root by altering the PATH variable to point to a user controlled location. When a crash is induced the trojan gdb command is executed. IBM X-Force ID: 163488. | |||||
| CVE-2019-4094 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Db2, Linux Kernel | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| IBM DB2 for Linux, UNIX and Windows (includes DB2 Connect Server) 9.7, 10.1, 10.5, and 11.1 binaries load shared libraries from an untrusted path potentially giving low privilege user full access to root by loading a malicious shared library. IBM X-Force ID: 158014. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3881 | 1 Bundler | 1 Bundler | 2024-11-21 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Bundler prior to 2.1.0 uses a predictable path in /tmp/, created with insecure permissions as a storage location for gems, if locations under the user's home directory are not available. If Bundler is used in a scenario where the user does not have a writable home directory, an attacker could place malicious code in this directory that would be later loaded and executed. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3726 | 1 Dell | 3 Client Platforms, Emc Servers, Update Package Framework | 2024-11-21 | 6.2 MEDIUM | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| An Uncontrolled Search Path Vulnerability is applicable to the following: Dell Update Package (DUP) Framework file versions prior to 19.1.0.413, and Framework file versions prior to 103.4.6.69 used in Dell EMC Servers. Dell Update Package (DUP) Framework file versions prior to 3.8.3.67 used in Dell Client Platforms. The vulnerability is limited to the DUP framework during the time window when a DUP is being executed by an administrator. During this time window, a locally authenticated low privilege malicious user potentially could exploit this vulnerability by tricking an administrator into running a trusted binary, causing it to load a malicious DLL and allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the victim system. The vulnerability does not affect the actual binary payload that the DUP delivers. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3667 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Techcheck | 2024-11-21 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 6.6 MEDIUM |
| DLL Search Order Hijacking vulnerability in the Microsoft Windows client in McAfee Tech Check 3.0.0.17 and earlier allows local users to execute arbitrary code via the local folder placed there by an attacker. | |||||
| CVE-2019-3613 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Agent | 2024-11-21 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| DLL Search Order Hijacking vulnerability in McAfee Agent (MA) prior to 5.6.4 allows attackers with local access to execute arbitrary code via execution from a compromised folder. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20856 | 2 Apple, Mattermost | 2 Macos, Mattermost Desktop | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Mattermost Desktop App before 4.3.0 on macOS. It allows dylib injection. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20781 | 1 Lg | 1 Bridge | 2024-11-21 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in LG Bridge before April 2019 on Windows. DLL Hijacking can occur. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20780 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered on LG mobile devices with Android OS 7.0, 7.1, 7.2, 8.0, and 8.1 software. Certain security settings, related to whether packages are verified and accepted only from known sources, are mishandled. The LG ID is LVE-SMP-190002 (April 2019). | |||||
| CVE-2019-20769 | 1 Lg | 2 G3, Pc Suite | 2024-11-21 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in LG PC Suite for LG G3 and earlier (aka LG PC Suite v5.3.27 and earlier). DLL Hijacking can occur via a Trojan horse DLL in the current working directory. The LG ID is LVE-MOT-190001 (November 2019). | |||||
| CVE-2019-20419 | 1 Atlassian | 2 Jira Data Center, Jira Server | 2024-11-21 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Affected versions of Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a DLL hijacking vulnerability in Tomcat. The affected versions are before version 8.5.5, and from version 8.6.0 before 8.7.2. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20406 | 2 Atlassian, Microsoft | 3 Confluence, Confluence Server, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| The usage of Tomcat in Confluence on the Microsoft Windows operating system before version 7.0.5, and from version 7.1.0 before version 7.1.1 allows local system attackers who have permission to write a DLL file in a directory in the global path environmental variable variable to inject code & escalate their privileges via a DLL hijacking vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20400 | 1 Atlassian | 1 Jira Server | 2024-11-21 | 4.4 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| The usage of Tomcat in Jira before version 8.5.2 allows local attackers with permission to write a dll file to a directory in the global path environmental variable can inject code into via a DLL hijacking vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2019-20358 | 2 Microsoft, Trendmicro | 2 Windows, Anti-threat Toolkit | 2024-11-21 | 5.1 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Trend Micro Anti-Threat Toolkit (ATTK) versions 1.62.0.1218 and below have a vulnerability that may allow an attacker to place malicious files in the same directory, potentially leading to arbitrary remote code execution (RCE) when executed. Another attack vector similar to CVE-2019-9491 was idenitfied and resolved in version 1.62.0.1228 of the tool. | |||||
| CVE-2019-1855 | 1 Cisco | 1 Jabber | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.3 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in the loading mechanism of specific dynamic link libraries in Cisco Jabber for Windows could allow an authenticated, local attacker to perform a DLL preloading attack. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker would need to have valid credentials on the Windows system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of the resources loaded by the application at run time. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting a malicious DLL file and placing it in a specific location on the targeted system. The malicious DLL file would execute when the Jabber application launches. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the target machine with the privileges of another user's account. | |||||