Total
715 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-8133 | 1 Nextcloud | 1 Nextcloud Server | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A wrong generation of the passphrase for the encrypted block in Nextcloud Server 19.0.1 allowed an attacker to overwrite blocks in a file. | |||||
| CVE-2020-7906 | 1 Jetbrains | 1 Rider | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In JetBrains Rider versions 2019.3 EAP2 through 2019.3 EAP7, there were unsigned binaries provided by the Windows installer. This issue was fixed in release version 2019.3. | |||||
| CVE-2020-6174 | 1 Linuxfoundation | 1 The Update Framework | 2026-06-17 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| TUF (aka The Update Framework) through 0.12.1 has Improper Verification of a Cryptographic Signature. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5407 | 1 Pivotal Software | 1 Spring Security | 2026-06-17 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| Spring Security versions 5.2.x prior to 5.2.4 and 5.3.x prior to 5.3.2 contain a signature wrapping vulnerability during SAML response validation. When using the spring-security-saml2-service-provider component, a malicious user can carefully modify an otherwise valid SAML response and append an arbitrary assertion that Spring Security will accept as valid. | |||||
| CVE-2020-5390 | 3 Canonical, Debian, Pysaml2 Project | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Pysaml2 | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| PySAML2 before 5.0.0 does not check that the signature in a SAML document is enveloped and thus signature wrapping is effective, i.e., it is affected by XML Signature Wrapping (XSW). The signature information and the node/object that is signed can be in different places and thus the signature verification will succeed, but the wrong data will be used. This specifically affects the verification of assertion that have been signed. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3308 | 1 Cisco | 2 Firepower Threat Defense, Secure Firewall Management Center | 2026-06-17 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the Image Signature Verification feature of Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with administrator-level credentials to install a malicious software patch on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper verification of digital signatures for patch images. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting an unsigned software patch to bypass signature checks and loading it on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to boot a malicious software patch image. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3209 | 1 Cisco | 1 Ios Xe | 2026-06-17 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in software image verification in Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, physical attacker to install and boot a malicious software image or execute unsigned binaries on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to an improper check on the area of code that manages the verification of the digital signatures of system image files during the initial boot process. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by loading unsigned software on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to install and boot a malicious software image or execute unsigned binaries on the targeted device. | |||||
| CVE-2020-3138 | 1 Cisco | 1 Enterprise Network Function Virtualization Infrastructure | 2026-06-17 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.7 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the upgrade component of Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software (NFVIS) could allow an authenticated, local attacker to install a malicious file when upgrading. The vulnerability is due to insufficient signature validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by providing a crafted upgrade file. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to upload crafted code to the affected device. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36843 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The implementation of EdDSA in EdDSA-Java (aka ed25519-java) through 0.3.0 exhibits signature malleability and does not satisfy the SUF-CMA (Strong Existential Unforgeability under Chosen Message Attacks) property. This allows attackers to create new valid signatures different from previous signatures for a known message. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36563 | 1 Robotsandpencils | 1 Go-saml | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| XML Digital Signatures generated and validated using this package use SHA-1, which may allow an attacker to craft inputs which cause hash collisions depending on their control over the input. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36285 | 1 Unionpayintl | 1 Union Pay | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Union Pay up to 3.3.12, for iOS mobile apps, contains a CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability, allows attackers to shop for free in merchants' websites and mobile apps, via a crafted authentication code (MAC) which is generated based on a secret key which is NULL. | |||||
| CVE-2020-36284 | 1 Unionpayintl | 1 Union Pay | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Union Pay up to 3.4.93.4.9, for android, contains a CWE-347: Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability, allows attackers to shop for free in merchants' websites and mobile apps, via a crafted authentication code (MAC) which is generated based on a secret key which is NULL. | |||||
| CVE-2020-2146 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Mac | 2026-06-17 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| Jenkins Mac Plugin 1.1.0 and earlier does not validate SSH host keys when connecting agents created by the plugin, enabling man-in-the-middle attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2020-2021 | 1 Paloaltonetworks | 1 Pan-os | 2026-06-17 | 9.3 HIGH | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| When Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) authentication is enabled and the 'Validate Identity Provider Certificate' option is disabled (unchecked), improper verification of signatures in PAN-OS SAML authentication enables an unauthenticated network-based attacker to access protected resources. The attacker must have network access to the vulnerable server to exploit this vulnerability. This issue affects PAN-OS 9.1 versions earlier than PAN-OS 9.1.3; PAN-OS 9.0 versions earlier than PAN-OS 9.0.9; PAN-OS 8.1 versions earlier than PAN-OS 8.1.15, and all versions of PAN-OS 8.0 (EOL). This issue does not affect PAN-OS 7.1. This issue cannot be exploited if SAML is not used for authentication. This issue cannot be exploited if the 'Validate Identity Provider Certificate' option is enabled (checked) in the SAML Identity Provider Server Profile. Resources that can be protected by SAML-based single sign-on (SSO) authentication are: GlobalProtect Gateway, GlobalProtect Portal, GlobalProtect Clientless VPN, Authentication and Captive Portal, PAN-OS next-generation firewalls (PA-Series, VM-Series) and Panorama web interfaces, Prisma Access In the case of GlobalProtect Gateways, GlobalProtect Portal, Clientless VPN, Captive Portal, and Prisma Access, an unauthenticated attacker with network access to the affected servers can gain access to protected resources if allowed by configured authentication and Security policies. There is no impact on the integrity and availability of the gateway, portal or VPN server. An attacker cannot inspect or tamper with sessions of regular users. In the worst case, this is a critical severity vulnerability with a CVSS Base Score of 10.0 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N). In the case of PAN-OS and Panorama web interfaces, this issue allows an unauthenticated attacker with network access to the PAN-OS or Panorama web interfaces to log in as an administrator and perform administrative actions. In the worst-case scenario, this is a critical severity vulnerability with a CVSS Base Score of 10.0 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). If the web interfaces are only accessible to a restricted management network, then the issue is lowered to a CVSS Base Score of 9.6 (CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). Palo Alto Networks is not aware of any malicious attempts to exploit this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2020-29438 | 1 Tesla | 2 Model X, Model X Firmware | 2026-06-17 | 3.3 LOW | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Tesla Model X vehicles before 2020-11-23 have key fobs that accept firmware updates without signature verification. This allows attackers to construct firmware that retrieves an unlock code from a secure enclave chip. | |||||
| CVE-2020-28086 | 1 Zx2c4 | 1 Password-store | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| pass through 1.7.3 has a possibility of using a password for an unintended resource. For exploitation to occur, the user must do a git pull, decrypt a password, and log into a remote service with the password. If an attacker controls the central Git server or one of the other members' machines, and also controls one of the services already in the password store, they can rename one of the password files in the Git repository to something else: pass doesn't correctly verify that the content of a file matches the filename, so a user might be tricked into decrypting the wrong password and sending that to a service that the attacker controls. NOTE: for environments in which this threat model is of concern, signing commits can be a solution. | |||||
| CVE-2020-28045 | 1 Pax | 1 Prolinos | 2026-06-17 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| An unsigned-library issue was discovered in ProlinOS through 2.4.161.8859R. This OS requires installed applications and all system binaries to be signed either by the manufacturer or by the Point Of Sale application developer and distributor. The signature is a 2048-byte RSA signature verified in the kernel prior to ELF execution. Shared libraries, however, do not need to be signed, and they are not verified. An attacker may execute a custom binary by compiling it as a shared object and loading it via LD_PRELOAD. | |||||
| CVE-2020-28042 | 1 Servicestack | 1 Servicestack | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| ServiceStack before 5.9.2 mishandles JWT signature verification unless an application has a custom ValidateToken function that establishes a valid minimum length for a signature. | |||||
| CVE-2020-27540 | 1 Company | 2 Cs-c2shw, Cs-c2shw Firmware | 2026-06-17 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Bash injection vulnerability and bypass of signature verification in Rostelecom CS-C2SHW 5.0.082.1. The camera reads firmware update configuration from SD card file vc\version.json. fw-sign parameter and from this configuration is directly inserted into a bash command. Firmware update is run automatically if there is special file on the inserted SD card. | |||||
| CVE-2020-26540 | 2 Apple, Foxitsoftware | 3 Macos, Foxit Reader, Phantompdf | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF before 4.1 on macOS. Because the Hardened Runtime protection mechanism is not applied to code signing, code injection (or an information leak) can occur. | |||||