Total
484 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-3521 | 1 Rpm | 1 Rpm | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| There is a flaw in RPM's signature functionality. OpenPGP subkeys are associated with a primary key via a "binding signature." RPM does not check the binding signature of subkeys prior to importing them. If an attacker is able to add or socially engineer another party to add a malicious subkey to a legitimate public key, RPM could wrongly trust a malicious signature. The greatest impact of this flaw is to data integrity. To exploit this flaw, an attacker must either compromise an RPM repository or convince an administrator to install an untrusted RPM or public key. It is strongly recommended to only use RPMs and public keys from trusted sources. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3445 | 3 Fedoraproject, Redhat, Rpm | 3 Fedora, Enterprise Linux, Libdnf | 2024-11-21 | 5.1 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| A flaw was found in libdnf's signature verification functionality in versions before 0.60.1. This flaw allows an attacker to achieve code execution if they can alter the header information of an RPM package and then trick a user or system into installing it. The highest risk of this vulnerability is to confidentiality, integrity, as well as system availability. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3421 | 3 Fedoraproject, Redhat, Rpm | 3 Fedora, Enterprise Linux, Rpm | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A flaw was found in the RPM package in the read functionality. This flaw allows an attacker who can convince a victim to install a seemingly verifiable package or compromise an RPM repository, to cause RPM database corruption. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data integrity. This flaw affects RPM versions before 4.17.0-alpha. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3196 | 1 Hitachi | 1 Id Bravura Security Fabric | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Hitachi ID Bravura Security Fabric 11.0.0 through 11.1.3, 12.0.0 through 12.0.2, and 12.1.0. When using federated identity management (authenticating via SAML through a third-party identity provider), an attacker can inject additional data into a signed SAML response being transmitted to the service provider (ID Bravura Security Fabric). The application successfully validates the signed values but uses the unsigned malicious values. An attacker with lower-privilege access to the application can inject the username of a high-privilege user to impersonate that user. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3051 | 1 Paloaltonetworks | 1 Cortex Xsoar | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| An improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability exists in Cortex XSOAR SAML authentication that enables an unauthenticated network-based attacker with specific knowledge of the Cortex XSOAR instance to access protected resources and perform unauthorized actions on the Cortex XSOAR server. This issue impacts: Cortex XSOAR 5.5.0 builds earlier than 1578677; Cortex XSOAR 6.0.2 builds earlier than 1576452; Cortex XSOAR 6.1.0 builds earlier than 1578663; Cortex XSOAR 6.2.0 builds earlier than 1578666. All Cortex XSOAR instances hosted by Palo Alto Networks are protected from this vulnerability; no additional action is required for these instances. | |||||
| CVE-2021-3033 | 1 Paloaltonetworks | 1 Prisma Cloud | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| An improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability exists in the Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud Compute console. This vulnerability enables an attacker to bypass signature validation during SAML authentication by logging in to the Prisma Cloud Compute console as any authorized user. This issue impacts: All versions of Prisma Cloud Compute 19.11, Prisma Cloud Compute 20.04, and Prisma Cloud Compute 20.09; Prisma Cloud Compute 20.12 before update 1. Prisma Cloud Compute SaaS version is not impacted by this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2021-39909 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2024-11-21 | 3.5 LOW | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Lack of email address ownership verification in the CODEOWNERS feature in all versions of GitLab EE starting from 11.3 before 14.2.6, all versions starting from 14.3 before 14.3.4, and all versions starting from 14.4 before 14.4.1 allows an attacker to bypass CODEOWNERS Merge Request approval requirement under rare circumstances | |||||
| CVE-2021-38195 | 1 Parity | 1 Libsecp256k1 | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in the libsecp256k1 crate before 0.5.0 for Rust. It can verify an invalid signature because it allows the R or S parameter to be larger than the curve order, aka an overflow. | |||||
| CVE-2021-37927 | 1 Zohocorp | 1 Manageengine Admanager Plus | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Zoho ManageEngine ADManager Plus version 7110 and prior allows account takeover via SSO. | |||||
| CVE-2021-37160 | 1 Swisslog-healthcare | 2 Hmi-3 Control Panel, Hmi-3 Control Panel Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A firmware validation issue was discovered in HMI3 Control Panel in Swisslog Healthcare Nexus Panel operated by released versions of software before Nexus Software 7.2.5.7. There is no firmware validation (e.g., cryptographic signature validation) during a File Upload for a firmware update. | |||||
| CVE-2021-37127 | 1 Huawei | 4 Imanager Neteco, Imanager Neteco 6000, Imanager Neteco 6000 Firmware and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.0 HIGH | 7.2 HIGH |
| There is a signature management vulnerability in some huawei products. An attacker can forge signature and bypass the signature check. During firmware update process, successful exploit this vulnerability can cause the forged system file overwrite the correct system file. Affected product versions include:iManager NetEco V600R010C00CP2001,V600R010C00CP2002,V600R010C00SPC100,V600R010C00SPC110,V600R010C00SPC120,V600R010C00SPC200,V600R010C00SPC210,V600R010C00SPC300;iManager NetEco 6000 V600R009C00SPC100,V600R009C00SPC110,V600R009C00SPC120,V600R009C00SPC190,V600R009C00SPC200,V600R009C00SPC201,V600R009C00SPC202,V600R009C00SPC210. | |||||
| CVE-2021-36277 | 1 Dell | 3 Alienware Command Center Application, Command \| Update, Update\/alienware Update | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| Dell Command | Update, Dell Update, and Alienware Update versions before 4.3 contains an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature Vulnerability. A local authenticated malicious user may exploit this vulnerability by executing arbitrary code on the system. | |||||
| CVE-2021-35113 | 1 Qualcomm | 96 Aqt1000, Aqt1000 Firmware, Csrb31024 and 93 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| Possible authentication bypass due to improper order of signature verification and hashing in the signature verification call in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Wearables | |||||
| CVE-2021-35097 | 1 Qualcomm | 258 Aqt1000, Aqt1000 Firmware, Ar8031 and 255 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| Possible authentication bypass due to improper order of signature verification and hashing in the signature verification call in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables | |||||
| CVE-2021-35039 | 2 Debian, Linux | 2 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel | 2024-11-21 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| kernel/module.c in the Linux kernel before 5.12.14 mishandles Signature Verification, aka CID-0c18f29aae7c. Without CONFIG_MODULE_SIG, verification that a kernel module is signed, for loading via init_module, does not occur for a module.sig_enforce=1 command-line argument. | |||||
| CVE-2021-34715 | 1 Cisco | 2 Expressway, Telepresence Video Communication Server | 2024-11-21 | 9.0 HIGH | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the image verification function of Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute code with internal user privileges on the underlying operating system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of the content of upgrade packages. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by uploading a malicious archive to the Upgrade page of the administrative web interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute code with user-level privileges (the _nobody account) on the underlying operating system. | |||||
| CVE-2021-34709 | 1 Cisco | 23 8101-32fh, 8101-32h, 8102-64h and 20 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 6.0 MEDIUM |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in image verification checks of Cisco Network Convergence System (NCS) 540 Series Routers, only when running Cisco IOS XR NCS540L software images, and Cisco IOS XR Software for Cisco 8000 Series Routers could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary code on the underlying operating system. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. | |||||
| CVE-2021-34708 | 1 Cisco | 23 8101-32fh, 8101-32h, 8102-64h and 20 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 6.0 MEDIUM |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in image verification checks of Cisco Network Convergence System (NCS) 540 Series Routers, only when running Cisco IOS XR NCS540L software images, and Cisco IOS XR Software for Cisco 8000 Series Routers could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary code on the underlying operating system. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. | |||||
| CVE-2021-34433 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Californium | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| In Eclipse Californium version 2.0.0 to 2.6.4 and 3.0.0-M1 to 3.0.0-M3, the certificate based (x509 and RPK) DTLS handshakes accidentally succeeds without verifying the server side's signature on the client side, if that signature is not included in the server's ServerKeyExchange. | |||||
| CVE-2021-34420 | 1 Zoom | 1 Zoom Client For Meetings | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| The Zoom Client for Meetings for Windows installer before version 5.5.4 does not properly verify the signature of files with .msi, .ps1, and .bat extensions. This could lead to a malicious actor installing malicious software on a customer’s computer. | |||||