Total
1403 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-47619 | 2 Debian, Oneidentity | 2 Debian Linux, Syslog-ng | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| syslog-ng is an enhanced log daemo. Prior to version 4.8.2, `tls_wildcard_match()` matches on certificates such as `foo.*.bar` although that is not allowed. It is also possible to pass partial wildcards such as `foo.a*c.bar` which glib matches but should be avoided / invalidated. This issue could have an impact on TLS connections, such as in man-in-the-middle situations. Version 4.8.2 contains a fix for the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2024-47258 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH | ||
| 2N Access Commander version 2.1 and prior is vulnerable in default settings to Man In The Middle attack due to not verifying certificates of 2N edge devices. 2N has currently released an updated version 3.3 of 2N Access Commander, with added Certificate Fingerprint Verification. Since version 2.2 of 2N Access Commander (released in February 2022) it is also possible to enforce TLS certificate validation.It is recommended that all customers update 2N Access Commander to the latest version and use one of two mentioned practices. | |||||
| CVE-2024-47241 | 1 Dell | 1 Secure Connect Gateway | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) 5.0 Appliance - SRS, version(s) 5.24, contains an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to unauthorized access and modification of transmitted data. | |||||
| CVE-2024-47119 | 1 Ibm | 1 Storage Defender Resiliency Service | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| IBM Storage Defender - Resiliency Service 2.0.0 through 2.0.9 does not properly validate a certificate which could allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by interfering in the communication path between the host and client. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45641 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Security Qradar Edr, Linux Kernel | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security ReaQta EDR 3.12 could allow an attacker to perform unauthorized actions due to improper SSL certificate validation. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45234 | 1 Nicmx | 1 Fort-validator | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in Fort before 1.6.3. A malicious RPKI repository that descends from a (trusted) Trust Anchor can serve (via rsync or RRDP) an ROA or a Manifest containing a signedAttrs encoded in non-canonical form. This bypasses Fort's BER decoder, reaching a point in the code that panics when faced with data not encoded in DER. Because Fort is an RPKI Relying Party, a panic can lead to Route Origin Validation unavailability, which can lead to compromised routing. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45205 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH | ||
| An Improper Certificate Validation on the UniFi iOS App managing a standalone UniFi Access Point (not using UniFi Network Application) could allow a malicious actor with access to an adjacent network to take control of this UniFi Access Point. Affected Products: UniFi iOS App (Version 10.17.7 and earlier) Mitigation: UniFi iOS App (Version 10.18.0 or later). | |||||
| CVE-2024-45159 | 1 Trustedfirmware | 1 Mbed Tls | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An issue was discovered in Mbed TLS 3.x before 3.6.1. With TLS 1.3, when a server enables optional authentication of the client, if the client-provided certificate does not have appropriate values in if keyUsage or extKeyUsage extensions, then the return value of mbedtls_ssl_get_verify_result() would incorrectly have the MBEDTLS_X509_BADCERT_KEY_USAGE and MBEDTLS_X509_BADCERT_KEY_USAGE bits clear. As a result, an attacker that had a certificate valid for uses other than TLS client authentication would nonetheless be able to use it for TLS client authentication. Only TLS 1.3 servers were affected, and only with optional authentication (with required authentication, the handshake would be aborted with a fatal alert). | |||||
| CVE-2024-43550 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 11 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH |
| Windows Secure Channel Spoofing Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2024-43201 | 3 Apple, Google, Planetfitness | 3 Iphone Os, Android, Planet Fitness Workouts | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| The Planet Fitness Workouts iOS and Android mobile apps fail to properly validate TLS certificates, allowing an attacker with appropriate network access to obtain session tokens and sensitive information. Planet Fitness first addressed this vulnerability in version 9.8.12 (released on 2024-07-25) and more recently in version 9.9.13 (released on 2025-02-11). | |||||
| CVE-2024-43177 | 1 Ibm | 1 Concert | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| IBM Concert 1.0.0 and 1.0.1 vulnerable to attacks that rely on the use of cookies without the SameSite attribute. | |||||
| CVE-2024-43107 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| Improper Certificate Validation (CWE-295) in the Gallagher Milestone Integration Plugin (MIP) permits unauthenticated messages (e.g. alarm events) to be sent to the Plugin. This issue effects Gallagher MIPS Plugin v4.0 prior to v4.0.32, all versions of v3.0 and prior. | |||||
| CVE-2024-42395 | 2 Arubanetworks, Hp | 2 Arubaos, Instantos | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| There is a vulnerability in the AP Certificate Management Service which could allow a threat actor to execute an unauthenticated RCE attack. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system leading to complete system compromise. | |||||
| CVE-2024-42193 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Bigfix Platform | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| HCL BigFix Web Reports' service communicates over HTTPS but exhibits a weakness in its handling of SSL certificate validation. This scenario presents a possibility of man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks and data exposure as, if exploited, this vulnerability could potentially lead to unauthorized access. | |||||
| CVE-2024-42186 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 2.8 LOW | ||
| BigFix Patch Download Plug-ins are affected by an insecure protocol support. The application can allow improper handling of SSL certificates validation. | |||||
| CVE-2024-41996 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| Validating the order of the public keys in the Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol, when an approved safe prime is used, allows remote attackers (from the client side) to trigger unnecessarily expensive server-side DHE modular-exponentiation calculations. The client may cause asymmetric resource consumption. The basic attack scenario is that the client must claim that it can only communicate with DHE, and the server must be configured to allow DHE and validate the order of the public key. | |||||
| CVE-2024-41724 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.7 HIGH | ||
| Improper Certificate Validation (CWE-295) in the Gallagher Command Centre SALTO integration allowed an attacker to spoof the SALTO server. This issue affects all versions of Gallagher Command Centre prior to 9.20.1043. | |||||
| CVE-2024-41334 | 1 Draytek | 40 Vigor165, Vigor165 Firmware, Vigor166 and 37 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Draytek devices Vigor 165/166 prior to v4.2.6 , Vigor 2620/LTE200 prior to v3.9.8.8, Vigor 2860/2925 prior to v3.9.7, Vigor 2862/2926 prior to v3.9.9.4, Vigor 2133/2762/2832 prior to v3.9.8, Vigor 2135/2765/2766 prior to v4.4.5.1, Vigor 2865/2866/2927 prior to v4.4.5.3, Vigor 2962/3910 prior to v4.3.2.7, Vigor 3912 prior to v4.3.5.2, and Vigor 2925 up to v3.9.6 were discovered to not utilize certificate verification, allowing attackers to upload crafted APPE modules from non-official servers, leading to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2024-41264 | 1 Casbin | 1 Casdoor | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue discovered in casdoor v1.636.0 allows attackers to obtain sensitive information via the ssh.InsecureIgnoreHostKey() method. | |||||
| CVE-2024-41258 | 1 Filestash | 1 Filestash | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| An issue was discovered in filestash v0.4. The usage of the ssh.InsecureIgnoreHostKey() disables host key verification, possibly allowing attackers to obtain sensitive information via a man-in-the-middle attack. | |||||