Total
1102 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-9558 | 1 Wawacu | 1 Wawa Employees Credit Union Mobile | 2025-04-20 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The wawa-employees-credit-union-mobile/id1158082793 app 4.0.1 for iOS does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2017-9593 | 1 Meafinancial | 1 Oculina Mobile Banking | 2025-04-20 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The "Oculina Mobile Banking" by Oculina Bank app 3.0.0 -- aka oculina-mobile-banking/id867025690 for iOS does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2016-1148 | 1 Photosynth | 1 Akerun | 2025-04-20 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Akerun - Smart Lock Robot App for iOS before 1.2.4 does not verify SSL certificates. | |||||
| CVE-2017-11506 | 1 Tenable | 1 Nessus | 2025-04-20 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 7.4 HIGH |
| When linking a Nessus scanner or agent to Tenable.io or other manager, Nessus 6.x before 6.11 does not verify the manager's TLS certificate when making the initial outgoing connection. This could allow man-in-the-middle attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2017-9574 | 1 Meafinancial | 1 Kc Area Credit Union Mobile Banking | 2025-04-20 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The "KC Area Credit Union Mobile Banking" by K C Area Credit Union app 3.0.1 -- aka kc-area-credit-union-mobile-banking/id1097607736 for iOS does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. | |||||
| CVE-2016-9892 | 1 Eset | 2 Endpoint Antivirus, Endpoint Security | 2025-04-20 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The esets_daemon service in ESET Endpoint Antivirus for macOS before 6.4.168.0 and Endpoint Security for macOS before 6.4.168.0 does not properly verify X.509 certificates from the edf.eset.com SSL server, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof this server and provide crafted responses to license activation requests via a self-signed certificate. NOTE: this issue can be combined with CVE-2016-0718 to execute arbitrary code remotely as root. | |||||
| CVE-2025-26478 | 2025-04-17 | N/A | 3.1 LOW | ||
| Dell ECS version 3.8.1.4 and prior contain an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2022-32531 | 1 Apache | 1 Bookkeeper | 2025-04-17 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| The Apache Bookkeeper Java Client (before 4.14.6 and also 4.15.0) does not close the connection to the bookkeeper server when TLS hostname verification fails. This leaves the bookkeeper client vulnerable to a man in the middle attack. The problem affects BookKeeper client prior to versions 4.14.6 and 4.15.1. | |||||
| CVE-2022-22747 | 1 Mozilla | 3 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Thunderbird | 2025-04-16 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| After accepting an untrusted certificate, handling an empty pkcs7 sequence as part of the certificate data could have lead to a crash. This crash is believed to be unexploitable. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 91.5, Firefox < 96, and Thunderbird < 91.5. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1834 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Thunderbird | 2025-04-16 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| When displaying the sender of an email, and the sender name contained the Braille Pattern Blank space character multiple times, Thunderbird would have displayed all the spaces. This could have been used by an attacker to send an email message with the attacker's digital signature, that was shown with an arbitrary sender email address chosen by the attacker. If the sender name started with a false email address, followed by many Braille space characters, the attacker's email address was not visible. Because Thunderbird compared the invisible sender address with the signature's email address, if the signing key or certificate was accepted by Thunderbird, the email was shown as having a valid digital signature. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 91.10. | |||||
| CVE-2022-1197 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Thunderbird | 2025-04-16 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| When importing a revoked key that specified key compromise as the revocation reason, Thunderbird did not update the existing copy of the key that was not yet revoked, and the existing key was kept as non-revoked. Revocation statements that used another revocation reason, or that didn't specify a revocation reason, were unaffected. This vulnerability affects Thunderbird < 91.8. | |||||
| CVE-2024-42193 | 2025-04-16 | N/A | N/A | ||
| HCL BigFix Web Reports' service communicates over HTTPS but exhibits a weakness in its handling of SSL certificate validation. This scenario presents a possibility of man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks and data exposure as, if exploited, this vulnerability could potentially lead to unauthorized access. | |||||
| CVE-2022-34469 | 2 Google, Mozilla | 2 Android, Firefox | 2025-04-15 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| When a TLS Certificate error occurs on a domain protected by the HSTS header, the browser should not allow the user to bypass the certificate error. On Firefox for Android, the user was presented with the option to bypass the error; this could only have been done by the user explicitly. <br>*This bug only affects Firefox for Android. Other operating systems are unaffected.*. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 102. | |||||
| CVE-2022-45419 | 1 Mozilla | 1 Firefox | 2025-04-15 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| If the user added a security exception for an invalid TLS certificate, opened an ongoing TLS connection with a server that used that certificate, and then deleted the exception, Firefox would have kept the connection alive, making it seem like the certificate was still trusted. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 107. | |||||
| CVE-2022-45197 | 1 Slixmpp Project | 1 Slixmpp | 2025-04-14 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Slixmpp before 1.8.3 lacks SSL Certificate hostname validation in XMLStream, allowing an attacker to pose as any server in the eyes of Slixmpp. | |||||
| CVE-2014-0363 | 1 Igniterealtime | 1 Smack | 2025-04-12 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The ServerTrustManager component in the Ignite Realtime Smack XMPP API before 4.0.0-rc1 does not verify basicConstraints and nameConstraints in X.509 certificate chains from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate chain. | |||||
| CVE-2015-3152 | 6 Debian, Fedoraproject, Mariadb and 3 more | 12 Debian Linux, Fedora, Mariadb and 9 more | 2025-04-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Oracle MySQL before 5.7.3, Oracle MySQL Connector/C (aka libmysqlclient) before 6.1.3, and MariaDB before 5.5.44 use the --ssl option to mean that SSL is optional, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers via a cleartext-downgrade attack, aka a "BACKRONYM" attack. | |||||
| CVE-2016-7171 | 1 Netapp | 1 Netapp Plug-in | 2025-04-12 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 5.6 MEDIUM |
| NetApp Plug-in for Symantec NetBackup prior to version 2.0.1 makes use of a non-unique server certificate, making it vulnerable to impersonation. | |||||
| CVE-2015-8960 | 7 Apple, Google, Ietf and 4 more | 18 Safari, Chrome, Transport Layer Security and 15 more | 2025-04-12 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| The TLS protocol 1.2 and earlier supports the rsa_fixed_dh, dss_fixed_dh, rsa_fixed_ecdh, and ecdsa_fixed_ecdh values for ClientCertificateType but does not directly document the ability to compute the master secret in certain situations with a client secret key and server public key but not a server secret key, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof TLS servers by leveraging knowledge of the secret key for an arbitrary installed client X.509 certificate, aka the "Key Compromise Impersonation (KCI)" issue. | |||||
| CVE-2015-4094 | 1 Thycotic | 1 Secret Server | 2025-04-12 | 5.8 MEDIUM | N/A |
| The Thycotic Password Manager Secret Server application through 2.3 for iOS does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. | |||||