Total
4130 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-47202 | 2026-05-26 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Kavita is a cross platform reading server. Prior to 0.9.0.2, an Improper Token validation flaw permits a remote and unauthenticated threat actor to request a JWT for any user including admins given knowledge of their username. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.9.0.2. | |||||
| CVE-2026-26128 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 11 more | 2026-05-26 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Improper authentication in Windows SMB Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | |||||
| CVE-2026-32253 | 1 Lizardbyte | 1 Sunshine | 2026-05-26 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Sunshine is a self-hosted game stream host for Moonlight. In versions prior to 2026.516.143833, the client-certificate authentication can be bypassed because of how OpenSSL verification results are handled. In src/crypto.cpp, the custom verify callback treats X509_V_ERR_UNABLE_TO_GET_ISSUER_CERT_LOCALLY, X509_V_ERR_CERT_NOT_YET_VALID, and X509_V_ERR_CERT_HAS_EXPIRED as success. This can allow an untrusted certificate to pass authentication and access protected HTTPS endpoints. This issue has been fixed in version 2026.516.143833. | |||||
| CVE-2025-34186 | 1 Ilevia | 2 Eve X1 Server, Eve X1 Server Firmware | 2026-05-26 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Ilevia EVE X1/X5 Server version ≤ 4.7.18.0.eden contains a vulnerability in its authentication mechanism. Unsanitized input is passed to a system() call for authentication, allowing attackers to inject special characters and manipulate command parsing. Because the binary interprets non-zero exit codes from system() as successful authentication, remote attackers can bypass authentication and gain full access to the system. | |||||
| CVE-2026-39969 | 2026-05-23 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
| TypeBot is a chatbot builder tool. In versions 3.16.0 and prior, the WhatsApp Cloud API webhook endpoint (POST /v1/workspaces/{workspaceId}/whatsapp/{credentialsId}/webhook) does not verify the x-hub-signature-256 HMAC signature included by Meta in every webhook delivery. The webhook URL exposes both workspaceId and credentialsId as path parameters, which are logged in web server access logs, visible in Meta's webhook configuration dashboard, and potentially shared when configuring integrations. This allows any unauthenticated attacker to send spoofed webhook messages to trigger bot flows, consume API resources, and interact with external services using the workspace owner's credentials. The issue has been fixed in version 3.17.0. | |||||
| CVE-2026-33117 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Sdk For Java | 2026-05-22 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| The Java Key Vault Keys library in the Azure SDK for Java contains an issue in the local cryptographic verification path where authentication tag comparison was implemented incorrectly. In affected applications that use the vulnerable local cryptography path, specially crafted encrypted input may bypass integrity verification checks. Operations delegated to the Key Vault service are not affected. The issue is addressed in version 4.10.6. | |||||
| CVE-2026-1524 | 1 Neo4j | 1 Neo4j | 2026-05-22 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An edgecase in SSO implementation in Neo4j Enterprise edition versions prior to version 2026.02 can lead to unauthorised access under the following conditions: If a neo4j admin configures two or more OIDC providers AND configures one or more of them to be an authorization provider AND configures one or more of them to be authentication-only, then those that are authentication-only will also provide authorization. This edgecase becomes a security problem only if the authentication-only provider contains groups which have higher privileges than provided by the intended (configured) authorization provider. When using multiple plugins for authentication and authorisation, prior to the fix the issue could lead to a plugin configured to provide only authentication or authorisation capabilities erroneously providing both capabilities. We recommend upgrading to versions 2026.02 (or 5.26.22) where the issue is fixed. | |||||
| CVE-2026-42822 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Azure Local, Azure Resource Manager | 2026-05-21 | N/A | 10.0 CRITICAL |
| Improper authentication in Azure Local Disconnected Operations allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | |||||
| CVE-2026-2812 | 3 Esri, Linux, Microsoft | 3 Arcgis Server, Linux Kernel, Windows | 2026-05-21 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| ArcGIS Server contains an improper authentication vulnerability in an undocumented administrative endpoint. An unauthenticated attacker could exploit this issue by sending a crafted request to the endpoint. Successful exploitation may result in disruption of the web-based browsing interface. This issue affects ArcGIS Server 12.0 and earlier. | |||||
| CVE-2026-40165 | 2026-05-21 | N/A | 8.7 HIGH | ||
| authentik is an open-source identity provider. Versions 2025.12.4 and prior, and versions 2026.2.0-rc1 through 2026.2.2 were vulnerable to Authentication Bypass through SAML NameID XML Comment Injection. Due to how authentik extracted the NameID value from a SAML assertion, it was possible for an attacker to trick authentik into only seeing a part of the NameID value, potentially allowing an attacker to gain access to other accounts. This issue could be exploited on an authentik instance with a SAML Source, where the attacker had an account on the SAML Source and the ability to modify their NameID value (commonly username or E-mail), and XML Signing was enabled. The attacker could modify the SAML assertion given to authentik by injecting a comment within the NameID value, which effectively truncated the NameID value to the snippet before the comment, and gave the attacker access to any user account. This issue has been fixed in versions 2025.12.5 and 2026.2.3. | |||||
| CVE-2026-44058 | 2026-05-21 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| An authentication bypass vulnerability in Netatalk 2.2.2 through 4.4.2 allows a remote privileged user to authenticate as an arbitrary user via the admin auth user mechanism. | |||||
| CVE-2023-4669 | 1 Exagate | 2 Sysguard 3001, Sysguard 3001 Firmware | 2026-05-21 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Authentication Bypass by Assumed-Immutable Data vulnerability in Exagate SYSGuard 3001 allows Authentication Bypass. This issue affects SYSGuard 3001: before 3.2.20.0. | |||||
| CVE-2026-9084 | 2026-05-20 | N/A | N/A | ||
| MISP’s OIDC authentication plugin allowed automatic linking of an OIDC identity to an existing local user account based on the email claim when the local account had no stored sub value. Under insecure or untrusted IdP configurations where email ownership is not enforced, an attacker with a valid OIDC token could assert a victim’s email address and authenticate as that user, leading to account takeover. | |||||
| CVE-2026-45434 | 1 Apache | 1 Ofbiz | 2026-05-20 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Improper Authentication vulnerability in Apache OFBiz via Password-Change Logic Flaw Leading to Remote Code Execution This issue affects Apache OFBiz: before 24.09.06. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 24.09.06, which fixes the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2026-6456 | 2026-05-20 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
| The Account Switcher plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.2. This is due to the `rememberLogin` REST API endpoint using a loose comparison (`!=` instead of `!==`) for secret validation at `app/RestAPI.php:111`, combined with no validation that the secret is non-empty. When a target user has never used the "Remember me" feature, their `asSecret` user meta does not exist, causing `get_user_meta()` to return an empty string. An attacker can send an empty `secret` parameter, which passes the comparison (`'' != ''` is `false`), and the endpoint then calls `wp_set_auth_cookie()` for the target user. Additionally, all REST routes use `permission_callback => '__return_true'` with no capability checks. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to switch to any user account including Administrator, ultimately granting themselves full administrative privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2026-31387 | 1 Apache | 1 Ofbiz | 2026-05-19 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Improper Authentication vulnerability in Apache OFBiz. This issue affects Apache OFBiz: before 24.09.06. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 24.09.06, which fixes the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2026-36829 | 2026-05-19 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in the embedded HTTP server of Panabit PAP-XM320 up to and including v7.7. The server validates session cookies using a filesystem existence check based on a user-controlled cookie value without proper sanitization, allowing directory traversal and bypass of authentication. | |||||
| CVE-2026-44166 | 1 Pocketbase | 1 Pocketbase | 2026-05-19 | N/A | 7.6 HIGH |
| Pocketbase is an open source web backend written in go. Prior to 0.22.42 and 0.37.4, in some situations, if an attacker knows the email address of the victim they can create and link an unverified PocketBase user in advance by authenticating with one of the OAuth2 app providers, e.g. "A". When the victim gets invited or decides to sign up to your app on their own with provider "B" (PocketBase OAuth2 auth requires to be with a different provider because we don't allow multiple OAuth2 accounts from the same provider to be associated to a single PocketBase user), the user created previously by the attacker will be autolinked, upgraded to "verified" and its old password reset. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.22.42 and 0.37.4. | |||||
| CVE-2025-14716 | 2026-05-19 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
| Improper Authentication vulnerability in Secomea GateManager (webserver modules) allows Authentication Bypass.This issue affects GateManager: 11.4;0. | |||||
| CVE-2026-44551 | 1 Openwebui | 1 Open Webui | 2026-05-18 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Open WebUI is a self-hosted artificial intelligence platform designed to operate entirely offline. Prior to 0.9.0, the LDAP authentication endpoint does not validate that the submitted password is non-empty before performing a Simple Bind against the LDAP server. The LdapForm Pydantic model accepts password: str with no minimum length constraint, so an empty string passes validation. The subsequent Connection.bind() call succeeds on vulnerable LDAP servers, and the application issues a full session token for the target user. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.9.0. | |||||
