Total
10295 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-1286 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 10, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019 | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Shell does not properly validate file paths.An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in the context of the current user, aka 'Windows Shell Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1239 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.8 HIGH |
| A memory corruption vulnerability exists when Windows Media Foundation improperly handles objects in memory, aka 'Media Foundation Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1238. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1195 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Edge | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) when the Feedback extension improperly validates input, aka 'Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1173 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Power Bi Report Server | 2024-11-21 | 3.5 LOW | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| A spoofing vulnerability exists in Microsoft Power BI Report Server in the way it validates the content-type of uploaded attachments, aka 'Microsoft Power BI Report Server Spoofing Vulnerability'. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1167 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 10, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019 | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| <p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that Microsoft Graphics Components handle objects in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on a target system.</p> <p>To exploit the vulnerability, a user would have to open a specially crafted file.</p> <p>The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how Microsoft Graphics Components handle objects in memory.</p> | |||||
| CVE-2020-1084 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 10, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019 | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A Denial Of Service vulnerability exists when Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service fails to validate certain function values.An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could deny dependent security feature functionality.To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would have to log on to an affected system and run a specially crafted application.The security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service validates certain function values., aka 'Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service Denial of Service Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1123. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1081 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 HIGH | 7.8 HIGH |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Printer Service improperly validates file paths while loading printer drivers, aka 'Windows Printer Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1044 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Sql Server Reporting Services | 2024-11-21 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| <p>A security feature bypass vulnerability exists in SQL Server Reporting Services (SSRS) when the server improperly validates attachments uploaded to reports. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could upload file types that were disallowed by an administrator.</p> <p>To exploit the vulnerability, an authenticated attacker would need to send a specially crafted request to an affected SSRS server.</p> <p>The update addresses the vulnerability by modifying how SSRS validates attachment uploads.</p> | |||||
| CVE-2020-1043 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016 | 2024-11-21 | 7.7 HIGH | 9.0 CRITICAL |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka 'Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1032, CVE-2020-1036, CVE-2020-1040, CVE-2020-1041, CVE-2020-1042. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1042 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016 | 2024-11-21 | 7.7 HIGH | 9.0 CRITICAL |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka 'Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1032, CVE-2020-1036, CVE-2020-1040, CVE-2020-1041, CVE-2020-1043. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1041 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016 | 2024-11-21 | 7.7 HIGH | 9.0 CRITICAL |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka 'Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1032, CVE-2020-1036, CVE-2020-1040, CVE-2020-1042, CVE-2020-1043. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1036 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016 | 2024-11-21 | 7.7 HIGH | 9.0 CRITICAL |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka 'Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1032, CVE-2020-1040, CVE-2020-1041, CVE-2020-1042, CVE-2020-1043. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1032 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016 | 2024-11-21 | 7.7 HIGH | 9.0 CRITICAL |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka 'Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2020-1036, CVE-2020-1040, CVE-2020-1041, CVE-2020-1042, CVE-2020-1043. | |||||
| CVE-2020-1025 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Lync, Sharepoint Enterprise Server, Sharepoint Foundation and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Microsoft SharePoint Server and Skype for Business Server improperly handle OAuth token validation. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could bypass authentication and achieve improper access. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need to modify the token. The update addresses the vulnerability by modifying how Microsoft SharePoint Server and Skype for Business Server validate tokens. | |||||
| CVE-2020-18685 | 1 Atlassian | 1 Floodlight | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Floodlight through 1.2 has poor input validation in checkFlow in StaticFlowEntryPusherResource.java because of unchecked prerequisites related to TCP or UDP ports, or group or table IDs. | |||||
| CVE-2020-18683 | 1 Atlassian | 1 Floodlight | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Floodlight through 1.2 has poor input validation in checkFlow in StaticFlowEntryPusherResource.java because of undefined fields mishandling. | |||||
| CVE-2020-17479 | 1 Json Pattern Validator Project | 1 Json Pattern Validator | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| jpv (aka Json Pattern Validator) before 2.2.2 does not properly validate input, as demonstrated by a corrupted array. | |||||
| CVE-2020-17444 | 1 Altran | 1 Picotcp | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in picoTCP 1.7.0. The routine for processing the next header field (and deducing whether the IPv6 extension headers are valid) doesn't check whether the header extension length field would overflow. Therefore, if it wraps around to zero, iterating through the extension headers will not increment the current data pointer. This leads to an infinite loop and Denial-of-Service in pico_ipv6_check_headers_sequence() in pico_ipv6.c. | |||||
| CVE-2020-17439 | 2 Contiki-os, Uip Project | 2 Contiki, Uip | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 8.3 HIGH |
| An issue was discovered in uIP 1.0, as used in Contiki 3.0 and other products. The code that parses incoming DNS packets does not validate that the incoming DNS replies match outgoing DNS queries in newdata() in resolv.c. Also, arbitrary DNS replies are parsed if there was any outgoing DNS query with a transaction ID that matches the transaction ID of an incoming reply. Provided that the default DNS cache is quite small (only four records) and that the transaction ID has a very limited set of values that is quite easy to guess, this can lead to DNS cache poisoning. | |||||
| CVE-2020-17393 | 1 Parallels | 1 Parallels Desktop | 2024-11-21 | 2.1 LOW | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| This vulnerability allows local attackers to disclose information on affected installations of Parallels Desktop 15.1.3-47255. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the prl_hypervisor kext. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result a pointer to be leaked after the handler is done. An attacker can leverage this in conjunction with other vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary code in the context of the kernel. Was ZDI-CAN-10520. | |||||