Total
10393 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-26108 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Viewer | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| When a user opens a manipulated Picture Exchange (.pcx, 2d.x3d) received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Viewer - version 9.0, the application crashes and becomes temporarily unavailable to the user until restart of the application. | |||||
| CVE-2022-26107 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Viewer | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| When a user opens a manipulated Jupiter Tesselation (.jt, JTReader.x3d) received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Viewer - version 9.0, the application crashes and becomes temporarily unavailable to the user until restart of the application. | |||||
| CVE-2022-26106 | 1 Sap | 1 3d Visual Enterprise Viewer | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| When a user opens a manipulated Computer Graphics Metafile (.cgm, CgmCore.dll) received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Viewer - version 9.0, the application crashes and becomes temporarily unavailable to the user until restart of the application. | |||||
| CVE-2022-26100 | 1 Sap | 1 Sapcar | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| SAPCAR - version 7.22, does not contain sufficient input validation on the SAPCAR archive. As a result, the SAPCAR process may crash, and the attacker may obtain privileged access to the system. | |||||
| CVE-2022-25976 | 1 Intel | 1 Virtual Raid On Cpu | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| Improper input validation in the Intel(R) VROC software before version 7.7.6.1003 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via local access. | |||||
| CVE-2022-25839 | 1 Url-js Project | 1 Url-js | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The package url-js before 2.1.0 are vulnerable to Improper Input Validation due to improper parsing, which makes it is possible for the hostname to be spoofed. http://\\\\\\\\localhost and http://localhost are the same URL. However, the hostname is not parsed as localhost, and the backslash is reflected as it is. | |||||
| CVE-2022-25757 | 1 Apache | 1 Apisix | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In Apache APISIX before 2.13.0, when decoding JSON with duplicate keys, lua-cjson will choose the last occurred value as the result. By passing a JSON with a duplicate key, the attacker can bypass the body_schema validation in the request-validation plugin. For example, `{"string_payload":"bad","string_payload":"good"}` can be used to hide the "bad" input. Systems satisfy three conditions below are affected by this attack: 1. use body_schema validation in the request-validation plugin 2. upstream application uses a special JSON library that chooses the first occurred value, like jsoniter or gojay 3. upstream application does not validate the input anymore. The fix in APISIX is to re-encode the validated JSON input back into the request body at the side of APISIX. Improper Input Validation vulnerability in __COMPONENT__ of Apache APISIX allows an attacker to __IMPACT__. This issue affects Apache APISIX Apache APISIX version 2.12.1 and prior versions. | |||||
| CVE-2022-25751 | 1 Siemens | 48 Scalance X302-7eec, Scalance X302-7eec Firmware, Scalance X304-2fe and 45 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V, coated), SCALANCE X304-2FE, SCALANCE X306-1LD FE, SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V, coated), SCALANCE X307-3, SCALANCE X307-3, SCALANCE X307-3LD, SCALANCE X307-3LD, SCALANCE X308-2, SCALANCE X308-2, SCALANCE X308-2LD, SCALANCE X308-2LD, SCALANCE X308-2LH, SCALANCE X308-2LH, SCALANCE X308-2LH+, SCALANCE X308-2LH+, SCALANCE X308-2M, SCALANCE X308-2M, SCALANCE X308-2M PoE, SCALANCE X308-2M PoE, SCALANCE X308-2M TS, SCALANCE X308-2M TS, SCALANCE X310, SCALANCE X310, SCALANCE X310FE, SCALANCE X310FE, SCALANCE X320-1 FE, SCALANCE X320-1-2LD FE, SCALANCE X408-2, SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M TS (24V), SCALANCE XR324-12M TS (24V), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE TS (24V, ports on front), SIPLUS NET SCALANCE X308-2. Affected devices do not properly validate the HTTP headers of incoming requests. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash affected devices. | |||||
| CVE-2022-25595 | 1 Asus | 2 Rt-ac86u, Rt-ac86u Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 MEDIUM | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| ASUS RT-AC86U has improper user request handling, which allows an unauthenticated LAN attacker to cause a denial of service by sending particular request a server-to-client reply attempt. | |||||
| CVE-2022-25271 | 2 Drupal, Fedoraproject | 2 Drupal, Fedora | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Drupal core's form API has a vulnerability where certain contributed or custom modules' forms may be vulnerable to improper input validation. This could allow an attacker to inject disallowed values or overwrite data. Affected forms are uncommon, but in certain cases an attacker could alter critical or sensitive data. | |||||
| CVE-2022-25163 | 2 Mistubishi, Mitsubishi | 6 Melsec Qj71e71-100, Melsec Iq-r Rd81mes96n, Melsec Iq-r Rd81mes96n Firmware and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC-Q Series QJ71E71-100 first 5 digits of serial number "24061" or prior, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC-L series LJ71E71-100 first 5 digits of serial number "24061" or prior and Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R Series RD81MES96N firmware version "08" or prior allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition or execute malicious code on the target products by sending specially crafted packets. | |||||
| CVE-2022-25162 | 2 Mitsubhishielectric, Mitsubishielectric | 194 Melsec Iq-fx5u-32mr\/ds, Melsec Iq-fx5u-32mr\/ds Firmware, Melsec Iq-fx5u-32mr\/dss and 191 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5U-xMy/z(x=32,64,80, y=T,R, z=ES,DS,ESS,DSS) with serial number 17X**** or later and versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5U-xMy/z(x=32,64,80, y=T,R, z=ES,DS,ESS,DSS) with serial number 179**** and prior and versions prior to 1.073, MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-xMy/z(x=32,64,96, y=T,R, z=D,DSS) with serial number 17X**** or later and versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-xMy/z(x=32,64,96, y=T,R, z=D,DSS) with serial number 179**** and prior and versions prior to 1.073, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-32MT/DS-TS versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-32MT/DSS-TS versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-32MR/DS-TS versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UJ-xMy/z(x=24,40,60, y=T,R, z=ES,ESS) versions prior to 1.030, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UJ-xMy/ES-A(x=24,40,60, y=T,R) versions prior to 1.031 and Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5S-xMy/z(x=30,40,60,80, y=T,R, z=ES,ESS) version 1.000 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a temporary DoS condition for the product's communication by sending specially crafted packets. | |||||
| CVE-2022-25161 | 2 Mitsubhishielectric, Mitsubishielectric | 194 Melsec Iq-fx5u-32mr\/ds, Melsec Iq-fx5u-32mr\/ds Firmware, Melsec Iq-fx5u-32mr\/dss and 191 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 HIGH | 8.6 HIGH |
| Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5U-xMy/z(x=32,64,80, y=T,R, z=ES,DS,ESS,DSS) with serial number 17X**** or later and versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5U-xMy/z(x=32,64,80, y=T,R, z=ES,DS,ESS,DSS) with serial number 179**** and prior and versions prior to 1.073, MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-xMy/z(x=32,64,96, y=T,R, z=D,DSS) with serial number 17X**** or later and versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-xMy/z(x=32,64,96, y=T,R, z=D,DSS) with serial number 179**** and prior and versions prior to 1.073, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-32MT/DS-TS versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-32MT/DSS-TS versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-32MR/DS-TS versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UJ-xMy/z(x=24,40,60, y=T,R, z=ES,ESS) versions prior to 1.030, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UJ-xMy/ES-A(x=24,40,60, y=T,R) versions prior to 1.031 and Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5S-xMy/z(x=30,40,60,80, y=T,R, z=ES,ESS) version 1.000 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a DoS condition for the product's program execution or communication by sending specially crafted packets. System reset of the product is required for recovery. | |||||
| CVE-2022-24952 | 1 Eternal Terminal Project | 1 Eternal Terminal | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Several denial of service vulnerabilities exist in Eternal Terminal prior to version 6.2.0, including a DoS triggered remotely by an invalid sequence number and a local bug triggered by invalid input sent directly to the IPC socket. | |||||
| CVE-2022-24925 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| Improper input validation vulnerability in SettingsProvider prior to Android S(12) allows privileged attackers to trigger a permanent denial of service attack on a victim's devices. | |||||
| CVE-2022-24881 | 1 Ballcat | 1 Codegen | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| Ballcat Codegen provides the function of online editing code to generate templates. In versions prior to 1.0.0.beta.2, attackers can implement remote code execution through malicious code injection of the template engine. This happens because Velocity and freemarker templates are introduced but input verification is not done. The fault is rectified in version 1.0.0.beta.2. | |||||
| CVE-2022-24861 | 1 Databasir | 1 Databasir | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 9.9 CRITICAL |
| Databasir is a team-oriented relational database model document management platform. Databasir 1.01 has remote code execution vulnerability. JDBC drivers are not validated prior to use and may be provided by users of the system. This can lead to code execution by any basic user who has access to the system. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds to this issue. | |||||
| CVE-2022-24775 | 2 Drupal, Guzzlephp | 2 Drupal, Psr-7 | 2024-11-21 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| guzzlehttp/psr7 is a PSR-7 HTTP message library. Versions prior to 1.8.4 and 2.1.1 are vulnerable to improper header parsing. An attacker could sneak in a new line character and pass untrusted values. The issue is patched in 1.8.4 and 2.1.1. There are currently no known workarounds. | |||||
| CVE-2022-24711 | 1 Codeigniter | 1 Codeigniter | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.4 CRITICAL |
| CodeIgniter4 is the 4.x branch of CodeIgniter, a PHP full-stack web framework. Prior to version 4.1.9, an improper input validation vulnerability allows attackers to execute CLI routes via HTTP request. Version 4.1.9 contains a patch. There are currently no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2022-24439 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Gitpython Project | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Gitpython | 2024-11-21 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| All versions of package gitpython are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) due to improper user input validation, which makes it possible to inject a maliciously crafted remote URL into the clone command. Exploiting this vulnerability is possible because the library makes external calls to git without sufficient sanitization of input arguments. | |||||