Total
10744 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-23705 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-12-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible failure to persist or enforce user restrictions due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2024-23668 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiwebmanager | 2024-12-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| An improper authorization in Fortinet FortiWebManager version 7.2.0 and 7.0.0 through 7.0.4 and 6.3.0 and 6.2.3 through 6.2.4 and 6.0.2 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via HTTP requests or CLI. | |||||
| CVE-2024-23707 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-12-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible permissions bypass due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2024-23706 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-12-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible bypass of health data permissions due to an improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2024-0045 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-12-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In smp_proc_sec_req of smp_act.cc, there is a possible out of bounds read due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2020-12487 | 2024-12-17 | N/A | 7.0 HIGH | ||
| Due to the flaws in the verification of input parameters, the attacker can input carefully constructed commands to make the ABE service execute some commands with root privilege. | |||||
| CVE-2024-0031 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-12-16 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| In attp_build_read_by_type_value_cmd of att_protocol.cc , there is a possible out of bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2024-23717 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-12-16 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| In access_secure_service_from_temp_bond of btm_sec.cc, there is a possible way to achieve keystroke injection due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2024-0021 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-12-16 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| In onCreate of NotificationAccessConfirmationActivity.java, there is a possible way for an app in the work profile to enable notification listener services due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | |||||
| CVE-2018-12123 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2024-12-13 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Node.js: All versions prior to Node.js 6.15.0, 8.14.0, 10.14.0 and 11.3.0: Hostname spoofing in URL parser for javascript protocol: If a Node.js application is using url.parse() to determine the URL hostname, that hostname can be spoofed by using a mixed case "javascript:" (e.g. "javAscript:") protocol (other protocols are not affected). If security decisions are made about the URL based on the hostname, they may be incorrect. | |||||
| CVE-2024-43052 | 1 Qualcomm | 182 205 Mobile Platform, 205 Mobile Platform Firmware, 215 Mobile Platform and 179 more | 2024-12-12 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Memory corruption while processing API calls to NPU with invalid input. | |||||
| CVE-2024-12401 | 2024-12-12 | N/A | 4.4 MEDIUM | ||
| A flaw was found in the cert-manager package. This flaw allows an attacker who can modify PEM data that the cert-manager reads, for example, in a Secret resource, to use large amounts of CPU in the cert-manager controller pod to effectively create a denial-of-service (DoS) vector for the cert-manager in the cluster. | |||||
| CVE-2023-31366 | 1 Amd | 1 Uprof | 2024-12-12 | N/A | 3.3 LOW |
| Improper input validation in AMD μProf could allow an attacker to perform a write to an invalid address, potentially resulting in denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2024-32989 | 1 Huawei | 2 Emui, Harmonyos | 2024-12-11 | N/A | 3.3 LOW |
| Insufficient verification vulnerability in the system sharing pop-up module Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability will affect availability. | |||||
| CVE-2024-32990 | 1 Huawei | 2 Emui, Harmonyos | 2024-12-11 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| Permission verification vulnerability in the system sharing pop-up module Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability will affect availability. | |||||
| CVE-2024-32992 | 1 Huawei | 2 Emui, Harmonyos | 2024-12-11 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| Insufficient verification vulnerability in the baseband module Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability will affect availability. | |||||
| CVE-2024-11737 | 2024-12-11 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| CWE-20: Improper Input Validation vulnerability exists that could lead to a denial of service and a loss of confidentiality, integrity of the controller when an unauthenticated crafted Modbus packet is sent to the device. | |||||
| CVE-2024-12353 | 1 Razormist | 1 Phone Contact Manager System | 2024-12-10 | 1.7 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in SourceCodester Phone Contact Manager System 1.0. This issue affects the function UserInterface::MenuDisplayStart of the component User Menu. The manipulation of the argument name leads to improper input validation. Attacking locally is a requirement. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | |||||
| CVE-2024-12355 | 1 Razormist | 1 Phone Contact Manager System | 2024-12-10 | 1.7 LOW | 3.3 LOW |
| A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Phone Contact Manager System 1.0 and classified as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is the function ContactBook::adding of the file ContactBook.cpp. The manipulation leads to improper input validation. The attack needs to be approached locally. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | |||||
| CVE-2024-55655 | 2024-12-10 | N/A | N/A | ||
| sigstore-python is a Python tool for generating and verifying Sigstore signatures. Versions of sigstore-python newer than 2.0.0 but prior to 3.6.0 perform insufficient validation of the "integration time" present in "v2" and "v3" bundles during the verification flow: the "integration time" is verified *if* a source of signed time (such as an inclusion promise) is present, but is otherwise trusted if no source of signed time is present. This does not affect "v1" bundles, as the "v1" bundle format always requires an inclusion promise. Sigstore uses signed time to support verification of signatures made against short-lived signing keys. The impact and severity of this weakness is *low*, as Sigstore contains multiple other enforcing components that prevent an attacker who modifies the integration timestamp within a bundle from impersonating a valid signature. In particular, an attacker who modifies the integration timestamp can induce a Denial of Service, but in no different manner than already possible with bundle access (e.g. modifying the signature itself such that it fails to verify). Separately, an attacker could upload a *new* entry to the transparency service, and substitute their new entry's time. However, this would still be rejected at validation time, as the new entry's (valid) signed time would be outside the validity window of the original signing certificate and would nonetheless render the attacker auditable. | |||||