Total
10393 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2023-25693 | 1 Apache | 1 Apache-airflow-providers-apache-sqoop | 2025-02-13 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
Improper Input Validation vulnerability in the Apache Airflow Sqoop Provider. This issue affects Apache Airflow Sqoop Provider versions before 3.1.1. | |||||
CVE-2021-36742 | 2 Microsoft, Trendmicro | 5 Windows, Apex One, Officescan and 2 more | 2025-02-13 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
A improper input validation vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex One, Apex One as a Service, OfficeScan XG and Worry-Free Business Security 10.0 SP1 allows a local attacker to escalate privileges on affected installations. Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. | |||||
CVE-2019-7193 | 1 Qnap | 1 Qts | 2025-02-13 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
This improper input validation vulnerability allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary code to the system. To fix the vulnerability, QNAP recommend updating QTS to their latest versions. | |||||
CVE-2025-0816 | 2025-02-13 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
CWE-20: Improper Input Validation vulnerability exists that could cause Denial-of-Service of the product when malicious IPV6 packets are sent to the device. | |||||
CVE-2025-0815 | 2025-02-13 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
CWE-20: Improper Input Validation vulnerability exists that could cause Denial-of-Service of the product when malicious ICMPV6 packets are sent to the device. | |||||
CVE-2025-0814 | 2025-02-13 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM | ||
CWE-20: Improper Input Validation vulnerability exists that could cause Denial-of-Service of the network services running on the product when malicious IEC61850-MMS packets are sent to the device. The core functionality of the breaker remains intact during the attack. | |||||
CVE-2024-10083 | 2025-02-13 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM | ||
CWE-20: Improper Input Validation vulnerability exists that could cause denial of service of engineering workstation when specific driver interface is invoked locally by an authenticated user with crafted input. | |||||
CVE-2024-42410 | 2025-02-12 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
Improper input validation in some Intel(R) Graphics Drivers may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via local access. | |||||
CVE-2024-39606 | 2025-02-12 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
Improper input validation in some Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless WiFi and Killerâ„¢ WiFi software for Windows before version 23.80 may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via adjacent access. | |||||
CVE-2024-38307 | 2025-02-12 | N/A | 7.7 HIGH | ||
Improper input validation in the firmware for some Intel(R) AMT and Intel(R) Standard Manageability may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via network access. | |||||
CVE-2024-31153 | 2025-02-12 | N/A | 5.0 MEDIUM | ||
Improper input validation for some Intel(R) QuickAssist Technology software before version 2.2.0 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via local access. | |||||
CVE-2024-29214 | 2025-02-12 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
Improper input validation in UEFI firmware CseVariableStorageSmm for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | |||||
CVE-2024-28127 | 2025-02-12 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
Improper input validation in UEFI firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | |||||
CVE-2024-25571 | 2025-02-12 | N/A | 2.3 LOW | ||
Improper input validation in some Intel(R) SPS firmware before SPS_E5_06.01.04.059.0 may allow a privileged user to potentially enable denial of service via local access. | |||||
CVE-2024-24582 | 2025-02-12 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
Improper input validation in XmlCli feature for UEFI firmware for some Intel(R) processors may allow privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | |||||
CVE-2023-49615 | 2025-02-12 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
Improper input validation in some Intel(R) System Security Report and System Resources Defense firmware may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | |||||
CVE-2023-43758 | 2025-02-12 | N/A | 8.2 HIGH | ||
Improper input validation in UEFI firmware for some Intel(R) processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | |||||
CVE-2023-34440 | 2025-02-12 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
Improper input validation in UEFI firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | |||||
CVE-2023-30450 | 1 Redpanda | 1 Redpanda | 2025-02-12 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
rpk in Redpanda before 23.1.2 mishandles the redpanda.rpc_server_tls field, leading to (for example) situations in which there is a data type mismatch that cannot be automatically fixed by rpk, and instead a user must reconfigure (while a cluster is turned off) in order to have TLS on broker RPC ports. NOTE: the fix was also backported to the 22.2 and 22.3 branches. | |||||
CVE-2024-2339 | 1 Dalibo | 1 Anonymizer | 2025-02-12 | N/A | 8.0 HIGH |
PostgreSQL Anonymizer v1.2 contains a vulnerability that allows a user who owns a table to elevate to superuser. A user can define a masking function for a column and place malicious code in that function. When a privileged user applies the masking rules using the static masking or the anonymous dump method, the malicious code is executed and can grant escalated privileges to the malicious user. PostgreSQL Anonymizer v1.2 does provide a protection against this risk with the restrict_to_trusted_schemas option, but that protection is incomplete. Users that don't own a table, especially masked users cannot exploit this vulnerability. The problem is resolved in v1.3. |