Total
87 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-31201 | 1 Apple | 5 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 2 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| This issue was addressed by removing the vulnerable code. This issue is fixed in iOS 18.4.1 and iPadOS 18.4.1, macOS Sequoia 15.4.1, tvOS 18.4.1, visionOS 2.4.1. An attacker with arbitrary read and write capability may be able to bypass Pointer Authentication. Apple is aware of a report that this issue may have been exploited in an extremely sophisticated attack against specific targeted individuals on iOS. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2498 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 3.1 LOW |
| An improper access control in Gitlab EE affecting all versions from 12.0 prior to 18.0.6, 18.1 prior to 18.1.4, and 18.2 prior to 18.2.2 that under certain conditions could have allowed users to view assigned issues from restricted groups by bypassing IP restrictions. | |||||
| CVE-2025-2408 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 13.12 before 17.8.7, 17.9 before 17.9.6, and 17.10 before 17.10.4. Under certain conditions users could bypass IP access restrictions and view sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2025-29987 | 1 Dell | 4 Data Domain Operating System, Powerprotect Data Domain, Powerprotect Dm5500 and 1 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain with Data Domain Operating System (DD OS) versions prior to 8.3.0.15 contain an Insufficient Granularity of Access Control vulnerability. An authenticated user from a trusted remote client could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2025-27026 | 1 Nokia | 2 G42, G42 Firmware | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.9 MEDIUM |
| A missing double-check feature in the WebGUI for CLI deactivation in Infinera G42 version R6.1.3 allows an authenticated administrator to make other management interfaces unavailable via local and network interfaces. The CLI deactivation via the WebGUI does not only stop CLI interface but deactivates also Linux Shell, WebGUI and Physical Serial Console access. No confirmation is asked at deactivation time. Loosing access to these services device administrators are at risk of completely loosing device control. | |||||
| CVE-2025-22839 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| Insufficient granularity of access control in the OOB-MSM for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) 6 Scalable processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via adjacent access. | |||||
| CVE-2025-20628 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| An insufficient granularity of access control vulnerability exists in PingIDM (formerly ForgeRock Identity Management) where administrators cannot properly configure access rules for Remote Connector Servers (RCS) running in client mode. This means attackers can spoof a client-mode RCS (if one exists) to intercept and/or modify an identity’s security-relevant properties, such as passwords and account recovery information. This issue is exploitable only when an RCS is configured to run in client mode. | |||||
| CVE-2025-20305 | 1 Cisco | 1 Identity Services Engine | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco ISE could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to obtain sensitive information from an affected device. This vulnerability exists because certain files lack proper data protection mechanisms. An attacker with read-only Administrator privileges could exploit this vulnerability by performing actions where the results should only be viewable to a high-privileged user. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view passwords that are normally not visible to read-only administrators. | |||||
| CVE-2025-20111 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.4 HIGH | ||
| A vulnerability in the health monitoring diagnostics of Cisco Nexus 3000 Series Switches and Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switches in standalone NX-OS mode could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to the incorrect handling of specific Ethernet frames. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a sustained rate of crafted Ethernet frames to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload. | |||||
| CVE-2025-1278 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 12.0 before 17.9.8, 17.10 before 17.10.6, and 17.11 before 17.11.2. Under certain conditions users could bypass IP access restrictions and view sensitive information. | |||||
| CVE-2025-1110 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 2.7 LOW |
| An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 18.0 before 18.0.1. In certain circumstances, a user with limited permissions could access Job Data via a crafted GraphQL query. | |||||
| CVE-2025-11246 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions from 15.4 before 18.5.5, 18.6 before 18.6.3, and 18.7 before 18.7.1 that could have allowed an authenticated user with specific permissions to remove all project runners from unrelated projects by manipulating GraphQL runner associations. | |||||
| CVE-2024-8927 | 1 Php | 1 Php | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In PHP versions 8.1.* before 8.1.30, 8.2.* before 8.2.24, 8.3.* before 8.3.12, HTTP_REDIRECT_STATUS variable is used to check whether or not CGI binary is being run by the HTTP server. However, in certain scenarios, the content of this variable can be controlled by the request submitter via HTTP headers, which can lead to cgi.force_redirect option not being correctly applied. In certain configurations this may lead to arbitrary file inclusion in PHP. | |||||
| CVE-2024-6867 | 1 Lunary | 1 Lunary | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the lunary-ai/lunary, specifically in the `runs/{run_id}/related` endpoint. This endpoint does not verify that the user has the necessary access rights to the run(s) they are accessing. As a result, it returns not only the specified run but also all runs that have the `run_id` listed as their parent run. This issue affects the main branch, commit a761d833. The vulnerability allows unauthorized users to obtain information about non-public runs and their related runs, given the `run_id` of a public or non-public run. | |||||
| CVE-2024-6696 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.9 MEDIUM | ||
| The product implements access controls via a policy or other feature with the intention to disable or restrict accesses (reads and/or writes) to assets in a system from untrusted agents. However, implemented access controls lack required granularity, which renders the control policy too broad because it allows accesses from unauthorized agents to the security-sensitive assets. (CWE-1220) Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Business Analytics Server versions before 10.2.0.0 and 9.3.0.9, including 8.3.x, do not correctly perform an authorization check in the user console trash content An attacker exploits a weakness in the configuration of access controls and is able to bypass the intended protection that these measures guard against and thereby obtain unauthorized access to the system or network. | |||||
| CVE-2024-5389 | 1 Lunary | 1 Lunary | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH |
| In lunary-ai/lunary version 1.2.13, an insufficient granularity of access control vulnerability allows users to create, update, get, and delete prompt variations for datasets not owned by their organization. This issue arises due to the application not properly validating the ownership of dataset prompts and their variations against the organization or project of the requesting user. As a result, unauthorized modifications to dataset prompts can occur, leading to altered or removed dataset prompts without proper authorization. This vulnerability impacts the integrity and consistency of dataset information, potentially affecting the results of experiments. | |||||
| CVE-2024-53295 | 1 Dell | 1 Data Domain Operating System | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| Dell PowerProtect DD versions prior to 8.3.0.0, 7.10.1.50, and 7.13.1.20 contain an improper access control vulnerability. A local malicious user with low privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability leading to escalation of privilege. | |||||
| CVE-2024-52814 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 2.8 LOW | ||
| Argo Helm is a collection of community maintained charts for `argoproj.github.io` projects. Prior to version 0.45.0, the `workflow-role`) lacks granularity in its privileges, giving permissions to `workflowtasksets` and `workflowartifactgctasks` to all workflow Pods, when only certain types of Pods created by the Controller require these privileges. The impact is minimal, as an attack could only affect status reporting for certain types of Pods and templates. Version 0.45.0 fixes the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2024-52799 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.2 HIGH | ||
| Argo Workflows Chart is used to set up argo and its needed dependencies through one command. Prior to 0.44.0, the workflow-role has excessive privileges, the worst being create pods/exec, which will allow kubectl exec into any Pod in the same namespace, i.e. arbitrary code execution within those Pods. If a user can be made to run a malicious template, their whole namespace can be compromised. This affects versions of the argo-workflows Chart that use appVersion: 3.4 and above, which no longer need these permissions for the only available Executor, Emissary. It could also affect users below 3.4 depending on their choice of Executor in those versions. This only affects the Helm Chart and not the upstream manifests. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.44.0. | |||||
| CVE-2024-4147 | 1 Lunary | 1 Lunary | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| In lunary-ai/lunary version 1.2.13, an insufficient granularity of access control vulnerability allows users to delete prompts created in other organizations through ID manipulation. The vulnerability stems from the application's failure to validate the ownership of the prompt before deletion, only checking if the user has permissions to delete such resources without verifying if it belongs to the user's project or organization. As a result, users can remove prompts not owned by their organization or project, leading to legitimate users being unable to access the removed prompts and causing information inconsistencies. | |||||