Total
13660 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-4395 | 1 Hp | 1 System Management Homepage | 2026-06-17 | 7.8 HIGH | 7.5 HIGH |
| HPE System Management Homepage before v7.6 allows remote attackers to have an unspecified impact via unknown vectors, related to a "Buffer Overflow" issue. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4359 | 1 Hp | 2 Loadrunner, Performance Center | 2026-06-17 | 7.5 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in mchan.dll in the agent in HPE LoadRunner 11.52 through patch 3, 12.00 through patch 1, 12.01 through patch 3, 12.02 through patch 2, and 12.50 through patch 3 and Performance Center 11.52 through patch 3, 12.00 through patch 1, 12.01 through patch 3, 12.20 through patch 2, and 12.50 through patch 1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long -server_name value, aka ZDI-CAN-3516. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4356 | 2 Canonical, Gnupg | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Libksba | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| The append_utf8_value function in the DN decoder (dn.c) in Libksba before 1.3.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read) by clearing the high bit of the byte after invalid utf-8 encoded data. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4355 | 2 Canonical, Gnupg | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Libksba | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| Multiple integer overflows in ber-decoder.c in Libksba before 1.3.3 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via crafted BER data, which leads to a buffer overflow. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4354 | 2 Canonical, Gnupg | 2 Ubuntu Linux, Libksba | 2026-06-17 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 7.5 HIGH |
| ber-decoder.c in Libksba before 1.3.3 uses an incorrect integer data type, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via crafted BER data, which leads to a buffer overflow. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4342 | 2 Opensuse, Php | 2 Leap, Php | 2026-06-17 | 8.3 HIGH | 8.8 HIGH |
| ext/phar/phar_object.c in PHP before 5.5.32, 5.6.x before 5.6.18, and 7.x before 7.0.3 mishandles zero-length uncompressed data, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted (1) TAR, (2) ZIP, or (3) PHAR archive. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4335 | 1 Lexmark | 1 Perceptive Document Filters | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.4 HIGH |
| An exploitable buffer overflow exists in the XLS parsing of the Lexmark Perspective Document Filters conversion functionality. A crafted XLS document can lead to a stack based buffer overflow resulting in remote code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4333 | 1 Hdfgroup | 1 Hdf5 | 2026-06-17 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 8.6 HIGH |
| The HDF5 1.8.16 library allocating space for the array using a value from the file has an impact within the loop for initializing said array allowing a value within the file to modify the loop's terminator. Due to this, an aggressor can cause the loop's index to point outside the bounds of the array when initializing it. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4330 | 1 Hdfgroup | 1 Hdf5 | 2026-06-17 | 6.9 MEDIUM | 8.6 HIGH |
| In the HDF5 1.8.16 library's failure to check if the number of dimensions for an array read from the file is within the bounds of the space allocated for it, a heap-based buffer overflow will occur, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4302 | 2 Libarchive, Redhat | 8 Libarchive, Enterprise Linux Desktop, Enterprise Linux Hpc Node and 5 more | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in the parse_codes function in archive_read_support_format_rar.c in libarchive before 3.2.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a RAR file with a zero-sized dictionary. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4301 | 1 Libarchive | 1 Libarchive | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in the parse_device function in archive_read_support_format_mtree.c in libarchive before 3.2.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted mtree file. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4296 | 1 Hancom | 1 Hancom Office 2014 | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| When opening a Hangul Hcell Document (.cell) and processing a record that uses the CSSValFormat object, Hancom Office 2014 will search for an underscore ("_") character at the end of the string and write a null terminator after it. If the character is at the very end of the string, the application will mistakenly write the null-byte outside the bounds of its destination. This can result in heap corruption that can lead code execution under the context of the application | |||||
| CVE-2016-4295 | 1 Hancom | 1 Hancom Office 2014 | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| When opening a Hangul Hcell Document (.cell) and processing a particular record within the Workbook stream, an index miscalculation leading to a heap overlow can be made to occur in Hancom Office 2014. The vulnerability occurs when processing data for a formula used to render a chart via the HncChartPlugin.hplg library. Due to a lack of bounds-checking when incrementing an index that is used for writing into a buffer for formulae, the application can be made to write pointer data outside its bounds which can lead to code execution under the context of the application. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4294 | 1 Hancom | 1 Hancom Office 2014 | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| When opening a Hangul Hcell Document (.cell) and processing a property record within the Workbook stream, Hancom Office 2014 will attempt to allocate space for an element using a length from the file. When copying user-supplied data to this buffer, however, the application will use a different size which leads to a heap-based buffer overflow. This vulnerability can lead to code-execution under the context of the application. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4293 | 1 Hancom | 1 Hancom Office 2014 | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| Multiple heap-based buffer overflows in the (1) CBookBase::SetDefTableStyle and (2) CBookBase::SetDefPivotStyle functions in Hancom Office 2014 VP allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Hangul Hcell Document (.cell) file. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4292 | 1 Hancom | 1 Hancom Office 2014 | 2026-06-17 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 7.8 HIGH |
| When opening a Hangul HShow Document (.hpt) and processing a structure within the document, Hancom Office 2014 will use a static size to allocate a heap buffer yet explicitly trust a size from the file when modifying data inside of it. Due to this, an aggressor can corrupt memory outside the bounds of this buffer which can lead to code execution under the context of the application. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4270 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 6 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc and 3 more | 2026-06-17 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Adobe Reader and Acrobat before 11.0.17, Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Classic before 15.006.30198, and Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Continuous before 15.017.20050 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-4191, CVE-2016-4192, CVE-2016-4193, CVE-2016-4194, CVE-2016-4195, CVE-2016-4196, CVE-2016-4197, CVE-2016-4198, CVE-2016-4199, CVE-2016-4200, CVE-2016-4201, CVE-2016-4202, CVE-2016-4203, CVE-2016-4204, CVE-2016-4205, CVE-2016-4206, CVE-2016-4207, CVE-2016-4208, CVE-2016-4211, CVE-2016-4212, CVE-2016-4213, CVE-2016-4214, CVE-2016-4250, CVE-2016-4251, CVE-2016-4252, CVE-2016-4254, CVE-2016-4265, CVE-2016-4266, CVE-2016-4267, CVE-2016-4268, and CVE-2016-4269. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4269 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 6 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc and 3 more | 2026-06-17 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Adobe Reader and Acrobat before 11.0.17, Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Classic before 15.006.30198, and Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Continuous before 15.017.20050 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-4191, CVE-2016-4192, CVE-2016-4193, CVE-2016-4194, CVE-2016-4195, CVE-2016-4196, CVE-2016-4197, CVE-2016-4198, CVE-2016-4199, CVE-2016-4200, CVE-2016-4201, CVE-2016-4202, CVE-2016-4203, CVE-2016-4204, CVE-2016-4205, CVE-2016-4206, CVE-2016-4207, CVE-2016-4208, CVE-2016-4211, CVE-2016-4212, CVE-2016-4213, CVE-2016-4214, CVE-2016-4250, CVE-2016-4251, CVE-2016-4252, CVE-2016-4254, CVE-2016-4265, CVE-2016-4266, CVE-2016-4267, CVE-2016-4268, and CVE-2016-4270. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4268 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 6 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc and 3 more | 2026-06-17 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Adobe Reader and Acrobat before 11.0.17, Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Classic before 15.006.30198, and Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Continuous before 15.017.20050 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-4191, CVE-2016-4192, CVE-2016-4193, CVE-2016-4194, CVE-2016-4195, CVE-2016-4196, CVE-2016-4197, CVE-2016-4198, CVE-2016-4199, CVE-2016-4200, CVE-2016-4201, CVE-2016-4202, CVE-2016-4203, CVE-2016-4204, CVE-2016-4205, CVE-2016-4206, CVE-2016-4207, CVE-2016-4208, CVE-2016-4211, CVE-2016-4212, CVE-2016-4213, CVE-2016-4214, CVE-2016-4250, CVE-2016-4251, CVE-2016-4252, CVE-2016-4254, CVE-2016-4265, CVE-2016-4266, CVE-2016-4267, CVE-2016-4269, and CVE-2016-4270. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4267 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 6 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader Dc and 3 more | 2026-06-17 | 10.0 HIGH | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Adobe Reader and Acrobat before 11.0.17, Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Classic before 15.006.30198, and Acrobat and Acrobat Reader DC Continuous before 15.017.20050 on Windows and OS X allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-4191, CVE-2016-4192, CVE-2016-4193, CVE-2016-4194, CVE-2016-4195, CVE-2016-4196, CVE-2016-4197, CVE-2016-4198, CVE-2016-4199, CVE-2016-4200, CVE-2016-4201, CVE-2016-4202, CVE-2016-4203, CVE-2016-4204, CVE-2016-4205, CVE-2016-4206, CVE-2016-4207, CVE-2016-4208, CVE-2016-4211, CVE-2016-4212, CVE-2016-4213, CVE-2016-4214, CVE-2016-4250, CVE-2016-4251, CVE-2016-4252, CVE-2016-4254, CVE-2016-4265, CVE-2016-4266, CVE-2016-4268, CVE-2016-4269, and CVE-2016-4270. | |||||