Total
36 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-41234 | 2025-06-12 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
| Description In Spring Framework, versions 6.0.x as of 6.0.5, versions 6.1.x and 6.2.x, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack when it sets a “Content-Disposition” header with a non-ASCII charset, where the filename attribute is derived from user-supplied input. Specifically, an application is vulnerable when all the following are true: * The header is prepared with org.springframework.http.ContentDisposition. * The filename is set via ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String, Charset). * The value for the filename is derived from user-supplied input. * The application does not sanitize the user-supplied input. * The downloaded content of the response is injected with malicious commands by the attacker (see RFD paper reference for details). An application is not vulnerable if any of the following is true: * The application does not set a “Content-Disposition” response header. * The header is not prepared with org.springframework.http.ContentDisposition. * The filename is set via one of: * ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String), or * ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String, ASCII) * The filename is not derived from user-supplied input. * The filename is derived from user-supplied input but sanitized by the application. * The attacker cannot inject malicious content in the downloaded content of the response. Affected Spring Products and VersionsSpring Framework: * 6.2.0 - 6.2.7 * 6.1.0 - 6.1.20 * 6.0.5 - 6.0.28 * Older, unsupported versions are not affected MitigationUsers of affected versions should upgrade to the corresponding fixed version. Affected version(s)Fix versionAvailability6.2.x6.2.8OSS6.1.x6.1.21OSS6.0.x6.0.29 Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ No further mitigation steps are necessary. CWE-113 in `Content-Disposition` handling in VMware Spring Framework versions 6.0.5 to 6.2.7 allows remote attackers to launch Reflected File Download (RFD) attacks via unsanitized user input in `ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String, Charset)` with non-ASCII charsets. | |||||
| CVE-2025-0825 | 2025-05-23 | N/A | N/A | ||
| cpp-httplib version v0.17.3 through v0.18.3 fails to filter CRLF characters ("\r\n") when those are prefixed with a null byte. This enables attackers to exploit CRLF injection that could further lead to HTTP Response Splitting, XSS, and more. | |||||
| CVE-2017-7443 | 2 Apt-cacher-ng Project, Apt-cacher Project | 2 Apt-cacher-ng, Apt-cacher | 2025-04-20 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| apt-cacher before 1.7.15 and apt-cacher-ng before 3.4 allow HTTP response splitting via encoded newline characters, related to lack of blocking for the %0[ad] regular expression. | |||||
| CVE-2017-1262 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Guardium | 2025-04-20 | 5.8 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| IBM Security Guardium 10.0 is vulnerable to HTTP response splitting attacks. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability using specially-crafted URL to cause the server to return a split response, once the URL is clicked. This would allow the attacker to perform further attacks, such as Web cache poisoning, cross-site scripting, and possibly obtain sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 124737. | |||||
| CVE-2017-12309 | 1 Cisco | 1 Email Security Appliance Firmware | 2025-04-20 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a HTTP response splitting attack. The vulnerability is due to the failure of the application or its environment to properly sanitize input values. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious HTTP headers, controlling the response body, or splitting the response into multiple responses. An exploit could allow the attacker to perform cross-site scripting attacks, cross-user defacement, web cache poisoning, and similar exploits. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvf16705. | |||||
| CVE-2015-1445 | 1 Fli4l | 1 Fli4l | 2025-04-20 | 9.0 HIGH | 7.2 HIGH |
| HTTP header injection in the httpd package in fli4l before 3.10.1 and 4.0 before 2015-01-30. | |||||
| CVE-2016-8024 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Virusscan Enterprise | 2025-04-20 | 6.8 MEDIUM | 8.1 HIGH |
| Improper neutralization of CRLF sequences in HTTP headers vulnerability in Intel Security VirusScan Enterprise Linux (VSEL) 2.0.3 (and earlier) allows remote unauthenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information via the server HTTP response spoofing. | |||||
| CVE-2016-4993 | 1 Redhat | 3 Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Wildfly Application Server | 2025-04-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| CRLF injection vulnerability in the Undertow web server in WildFly 10.0.0, as used in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 7.x before 7.0.2, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2016-5325 | 2 Nodejs, Suse | 2 Node.js, Linux Enterprise | 2025-04-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| CRLF injection vulnerability in the ServerResponse#writeHead function in Node.js 0.10.x before 0.10.47, 0.12.x before 0.12.16, 4.x before 4.6.0, and 6.x before 6.7.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via the reason argument. | |||||
| CVE-2015-0733 | 1 Cisco | 1 Headend Digital Broadband Delivery System | 2025-04-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | N/A |
| CRLF injection vulnerability in the HTTP Header Handler in Digital Broadband Delivery System in Cisco Headend System Release allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers, and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks or cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, via a crafted request, aka Bug ID CSCur25580. | |||||
| CVE-2016-6839 | 1 Huawei | 1 Fusionaccess | 2025-04-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| CRLF injection vulnerability in Huawei FusionAccess before V100R006C00 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2016-5699 | 1 Python | 1 Python | 2025-04-12 | 4.3 MEDIUM | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| CRLF injection vulnerability in the HTTPConnection.putheader function in urllib2 and urllib in CPython (aka Python) before 2.7.10 and 3.x before 3.4.4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers via CRLF sequences in a URL. | |||||
| CVE-2007-5595 | 1 Drupal | 1 Drupal | 2025-04-09 | 5.1 MEDIUM | N/A |
| CRLF injection vulnerability in the drupal_goto function in includes/common.inc Drupal 4.7.x before 4.7.8 and 5.x before 5.3 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via unspecified vectors. | |||||
| CVE-2022-37436 | 1 Apache | 1 Http Server | 2025-04-04 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| Prior to Apache HTTP Server 2.4.55, a malicious backend can cause the response headers to be truncated early, resulting in some headers being incorporated into the response body. If the later headers have any security purpose, they will not be interpreted by the client. | |||||
| CVE-2025-30221 | 2025-03-27 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| Pitchfork is a preforking HTTP server for Rack applications. Versions prior to 0.11.0 are vulnerable to HTTP Response Header Injection when used in conjunction with Rack 3. The issue was fixed in Pitchfork release 0.11.0. No known workarounds are available. | |||||
| CVE-2025-0588 | 2025-03-13 | N/A | N/A | ||
| In affected versions of Octopus Server it was possible for a user with sufficient access to set custom headers in all server responses. By submitting a specifically crafted referrer header the user could ensure that all subsequent server responses would return 500 errors rendering the site mostly unusable. The user would be able to subsequently set and unset the referrer header to control the denial of service state with a valid CSRF token whilst new CSRF tokens could not be generated. | |||||
| CVE-2024-54021 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortios, Fortiproxy | 2025-02-03 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| An improper neutralization of crlf sequences in http headers ('http response splitting') in Fortinet FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.6.0, FortiProxy 7.2.0 through 7.4.5 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted HTTP header. | |||||
| CVE-2024-52875 | 2025-01-31 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
| An issue was discovered in GFI Kerio Control 9.2.5 through 9.4.5. The dest GET parameter passed to the /nonauth/addCertException.cs and /nonauth/guestConfirm.cs and /nonauth/expiration.cs pages is not properly sanitized before being used to generate a Location HTTP header in a 302 HTTP response. This can be exploited to perform Open Redirect or HTTP Response Splitting attacks, which in turn lead to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). Remote command execution can be achieved by leveraging the upgrade feature in the admin interface. | |||||
| CVE-2024-45687 | 2025-01-21 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers ('HTTP Request/Response Splitting') vulnerability in Payara Platform Payara Server (Grizzly, REST Management Interface modules), Payara Platform Payara Micro (Grizzly modules) allows Manipulating State, Identity Spoofing.This issue affects Payara Server: from 4.1.151 through 4.1.2.191.51, from 5.20.0 through 5.70.0, from 5.2020.2 through 5.2022.5, from 6.2022.1 through 6.2024.12, from 6.0.0 through 6.21.0; Payara Micro: from 4.1.152 through 4.1.2.191.51, from 5.20.0 through 5.70.0, from 5.2020.2 through 5.2022.5, from 6.2022.1 through 6.2024.12, from 6.0.0 through 6.21.0. | |||||
| CVE-2023-0508 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2025-01-07 | N/A | 3.1 LOW |
| An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 15.4 before 15.10.8, all versions starting from 15.11 before 15.11.7, all versions starting from 16.0 before 16.0.2. Open redirection was possible via HTTP response splitting in the NPM package API. | |||||