CVE-2024-53214

{"id": "CVE-2024-53214", "cveTags": [], "metrics": {"cvssMetricV31": [{"type": "Primary", "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "cvssData": {"scope": "UNCHANGED", "version": "3.1", "baseScore": 7.8, "attackVector": "LOCAL", "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "userInteraction": "NONE", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH"}, "impactScore": 5.9, "exploitabilityScore": 1.8}, {"type": "Secondary", "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "cvssData": {"scope": "UNCHANGED", "version": "3.1", "baseScore": 7.8, "attackVector": "LOCAL", "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "userInteraction": "NONE", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH"}, "impactScore": 5.9, "exploitabilityScore": 1.8}]}, "published": "2024-12-27T14:15:29.337", "references": [{"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/06f2fcf49854ad05a09d09e0dbee6544fff04695", "tags": ["Patch"], "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"}, {"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0918f5643fc6c3f7801f4a22397d2cc09ba99207", "tags": ["Patch"], "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"}, {"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1ef195178fb552478eb2587df4ad3be14ef76507", "tags": ["Patch"], "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"}, {"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4464e5aa3aa4574063640f1082f7d7e323af8eb4", "tags": ["Patch"], "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"}, {"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6c6502d944168cbd7e03a4a08ad6488f78d73485", "tags": ["Patch"], "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"}, {"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7d121f66b67921fb3b95e0ea9856bfba53733e91", "tags": ["Patch"], "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"}, {"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/949bee8065a85a5c6607c624dc05b5bc17119699", "tags": ["Patch"], "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"}, {"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9567bd34aa3b986736c290c5bcba47e0182ac47a", "tags": ["Patch"], "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"}, {"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fe4bf8d0b6716a423b16495d55b35d3fe515905d", "tags": ["Patch"], "source": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"}], "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": [{"type": "Primary", "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "description": [{"lang": "en", "value": "CWE-129"}]}, {"type": "Secondary", "source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "description": [{"lang": "en", "value": "CWE-129"}]}], "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nvfio/pci: Properly hide first-in-list PCIe extended capability\n\nThere are cases where a PCIe extended capability should be hidden from\nthe user. For example, an unknown capability (i.e., capability with ID\ngreater than PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX) or a capability that is intentionally\nchosen to be hidden from the user.\n\nHiding a capability is done by virtualizing and modifying the 'Next\nCapability Offset' field of the previous capability so it points to the\ncapability after the one that should be hidden.\n\nThe special case where the first capability in the list should be hidden\nis handled differently because there is no previous capability that can\nbe modified. In this case, the capability ID and version are zeroed\nwhile leaving the next pointer intact. This hides the capability and\nleaves an anchor for the rest of the capability list.\n\nHowever, today, hiding the first capability in the list is not done\nproperly if the capability is unknown, as struct\nvfio_pci_core_device->pci_config_map is set to the capability ID during\ninitialization but the capability ID is not properly checked later when\nused in vfio_config_do_rw(). This leads to the following warning [1] and\nto an out-of-bounds access to ecap_perms array.\n\nFix it by checking cap_id in vfio_config_do_rw(), and if it is greater\nthan PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX, use an alternative struct perm_bits for direct\nread only access instead of the ecap_perms array.\n\nNote that this is safe since the above is the only case where cap_id can\nexceed PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX (except for the special capabilities, which\nare already checked before).\n\n[1]\n\nWARNING: CPU: 118 PID: 5329 at drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c:1900 vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core]\nCPU: 118 UID: 0 PID: 5329 Comm: simx-qemu-syste Not tainted 6.12.0+ #1\n(snip)\nCall Trace:\n <TASK>\n ? show_regs+0x69/0x80\n ? __warn+0x8d/0x140\n ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core]\n ? report_bug+0x18f/0x1a0\n ? handle_bug+0x63/0xa0\n ? exc_invalid_op+0x19/0x70\n ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20\n ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core]\n ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x244/0x430 [vfio_pci_core]\n vfio_pci_rw+0x101/0x1b0 [vfio_pci_core]\n vfio_pci_core_read+0x1d/0x30 [vfio_pci_core]\n vfio_device_fops_read+0x27/0x40 [vfio]\n vfs_read+0xbd/0x340\n ? vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl+0xbb/0x740 [vfio]\n ? __rseq_handle_notify_resume+0xa4/0x4b0\n __x64_sys_pread64+0x96/0xc0\n x64_sys_call+0x1c3d/0x20d0\n do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x120\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e"}, {"lang": "es", "value": "En el kernel de Linux, se ha resuelto la siguiente vulnerabilidad: vfio/pci: Ocultar correctamente la primera capacidad extendida PCIe de la lista Hay casos en los que una capacidad extendida PCIe deber\u00eda estar oculta al usuario. Por ejemplo, una capacidad desconocida (es decir, una capacidad con un ID mayor que PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX) o una capacidad que se elige intencionalmente para que est\u00e9 oculta al usuario. Para ocultar una capacidad, se virtualiza y modifica el campo \"Next Capability Offset\" de la capacidad anterior para que apunte a la capacidad despu\u00e9s de la que deber\u00eda estar oculta. El caso especial en el que la primera capacidad de la lista deber\u00eda estar oculta se gestiona de forma diferente porque no hay ninguna capacidad anterior que pueda modificarse. En este caso, el ID y la versi\u00f3n de la capacidad se ponen a cero mientras que el siguiente puntero queda intacto. Esto oculta la capacidad y deja un ancla para el resto de la lista de capacidades. Sin embargo, hoy en d\u00eda, ocultar la primera capacidad en la lista no se hace correctamente si la capacidad es desconocida, ya que struct vfio_pci_core_device-&gt;pci_config_map se establece en el ID de capacidad durante la inicializaci\u00f3n, pero el ID de capacidad no se verifica correctamente m\u00e1s tarde cuando se usa en vfio_config_do_rw(). Esto lleva a la siguiente advertencia [1] y a un acceso fuera de los l\u00edmites a la matriz ecap_perms. Arr\u00e9glelo verificando cap_id en vfio_config_do_rw(), y si es mayor que PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX, use un struct perm_bits alternativo para acceso directo de solo lectura en lugar de la matriz ecap_perms. Tenga en cuenta que esto es seguro ya que el anterior es el \u00fanico caso en el que cap_id puede superar a PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX (excepto para las capacidades especiales, que ya se verificaron antes). [1] ADVERTENCIA: CPU: 118 PID: 5329 en drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c:1900 vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] CPU: 118 UID: 0 PID: 5329 Comm: simx-qemu-syste No contaminado 6.12.0+ #1 (fragmento) Seguimiento de llamadas: ? show_regs+0x69/0x80 ? __warn+0x8d/0x140 ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] ? report_bug+0x18f/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x63/0xa0 ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [n\u00facleo vfio_pci] vfio_pci_rw+0x244/0x430 [n\u00facleo vfio_pci] vfio_pci_rw+0x101/0x1b0 [n\u00facleo vfio_pci] vfio_pci_core_read+0x1d/0x30 [n\u00facleo vfio_pci] vfio_device_fops_read+0x27/0x40 [vfio] vfs_read+0xbd/0x340 ? vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl+0xbb/0x740 [vfio] ? __rseq_handle_notify_resume+0xa4/0x4b0 __x64_sys_pread64+0x96/0xc0 x64_sys_call+0x1c3d/0x20d0 do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x120 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e"}], "lastModified": "2025-10-01T20:17:21.180", "configurations": [{"nodes": [{"negate": false, "cpeMatch": [{"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "DB4E1334-C025-4759-8434-D2E437248F16", "versionEndExcluding": "4.19.325", "versionStartIncluding": "3.6"}, {"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "E4B15788-D35E-4E5B-A9C0-070AE3729B34", "versionEndExcluding": "5.4.287", "versionStartIncluding": "4.20"}, {"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "B5C644CC-2BD7-4E32-BC54-8DCC7ABE9935", "versionEndExcluding": "5.10.231", "versionStartIncluding": "5.5"}, {"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "419FD073-1517-4FD5-8158-F94BC68A1E89", "versionEndExcluding": "5.15.174", "versionStartIncluding": "5.11"}, {"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "09AC6122-E2A4-40FE-9D33-268A1B2EC265", "versionEndExcluding": "6.1.120", "versionStartIncluding": "5.16"}, {"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "CA16DEE3-ABEC-4449-9F4A-7A3DC4FC36C7", "versionEndExcluding": "6.6.64", "versionStartIncluding": "6.2"}, {"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "21434379-192D-472F-9B54-D45E3650E893", "versionEndExcluding": "6.11.11", "versionStartIncluding": "6.7"}, {"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "vulnerable": true, "matchCriteriaId": "D8882B1B-2ABC-4838-AC1D-DBDBB5764776", "versionEndExcluding": "6.12.2", "versionStartIncluding": "6.12"}], "operator": "OR"}]}], "sourceIdentifier": "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67"}